Government

June 13, 2018

Creditor does not need to give notice of default to corporate debtor: NCLT


National-Company-Law-Tribunal

Prior notice is not required to be given by a creditor under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to establish that a corporate debtor has defaulted in making repayment, observed the Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

According to Sec 3(12) of the IBC, default means non-payment of debt when the whole, a part or an installment of the debt becomes due and is not repaid by the debtor/ corporate debtor as the case may be, said the tribunal.

In this definition, it has not been said anywhere that prior notice is required to be given to establish that the corporate debtor defaulted in making repayment to the creditor. It only says that non-payment of installment of the amount of debt will become due and such due will become default as mentioned in this definition. “In fact, in the balance confirmation given by the corporate debtor on June 30, 2017, it has been said that this corporate debtor has to pay so and so amount towards the loan account,” said tribunal members BSV Prakash Kumar and Ravikumar Duraisamy recently while admitting State Bank of India’s petition seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Videocon Telecommunications.

The NCLT members allowed initiation of the CIRP on a company petition filed by the SBI against Videocon Telecommunications, under Section 7 of the IBC, for having defaulted in making a repayment of Rs 234.36 crore as on December 27, 2017.

The members’ observations come in the wake of the corporate debtor contending that no notice was given to it that it had defaulted in making repayment of the loan amount as agreed by it. To this, the petitioner (SBI) said that the percentage of the loan to be paid by installments has already been tabulated.

Referring to the code, the members said that it is nowhere explained that it has to be separately notified to the corporate debtor that it has defaulted in making repayment to the financial creditor (sub section Z(3)(a) of the code only says “record of the default recorded with the information utility or such other record or evidence of default as may be specified”) .

To fulfil this mandate, the petitioner filed the report of the Central Repository of Information on Large Credits, dated December 28, 2017, reflecting this asset is classified as substandard.

SBI and its three erstwhile associate banks – State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, State Bank of Mysore and State Bank of Patiala – had sanctioned loans aggregating Rs 1,700 crore to Videocon Telecommunications in 2010. They disbursed loans aggregating Rs 799 crore, and the amount outstanding is Rs 677 crore.

(Credit: The Hindu)

Related Post

latest News

  • About 200% Salary Hike awarded to Supreme Court, High Court Judges

    With the bill being passed by President Ram Nath Kovind in regard of the salary hike of the Supreme Court and high court judges, a two-fold salary hik...

    Read More
  • Court cannot assume the role of super guardian: SC

    On January 8, the Supreme Court acceded to the wish of a girl, saying that she was now a major and entitled to enjoy her freedom and the courts should...

    Read More
  • HC Demands Explanation From BMC Regarding Resurfacing Of Lalbaug Flyover Without Conducting Structural Audit

    On February 27, the Bombay High Court demanded an explanation from the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) as to how it issued tenders and work o...

    Read More