America

March 01, 2017

SC Rejects Challenge To Political Ad Disclosure Rules


US Supreme Court

The US top court upheld political advertising disclosure rules by rejecting an appeal by a Denver-based libertarian think tank that wanted to run an advertisement without being forced to divulge its major donors.

The Denver-based Independence Institute has taken legal action against the Federal Election Commission, arguing that the law requiring such disclosure violated its free speech rights under the US Constitution's First Amendment. The Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's ruling of 2016 in favor of the commission.

The Independence Institute was supported in the case by influential Republican and conservative voices, including Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the Judicial Watch legal activist group as well as the US Chamber of Commerce business group.

The institute, ahead of the 2014 congressional elections, had sought to run a radio advertisement about increasing prison costs, telling listeners to urge their Colorado US senators to support sentencing reform.

Because the advertisement had mentioned a senator by name in the lead up to an election, it triggered a provision in the 2002 campaign finance statute known as the McCain-Feingold law requiring the institute to file with the election commission and disclose any donors supporting the advertisement.

Related Post

latest News

  • Takata Pleads Guilty To Wire Fraud In Air Bag Defects

    Takata, Japanese automobile parts manufacturer company, pleaded guilty to wire fraud arising out of air bag defects that killed 16 people. Takata was ...

    Read More
  • Indians with EU, UK residency visas to receive entry visas on arrival to UAE

    On September 13, UAE Cabinet Chaired by Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, Vice President of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, approved regulation for Indian passp...

    Read More
  • NEW ANTI-CORRUPTION LAW PUNISHES SEEKING SEXUAL FAVORS

    Under the new anti-corruption law, asking for and accepting sexual favors can be considered a bribe. Such accused stand to get seven years’ imprison...

    Read More