News

October 10, 2019

Sole Proprietary Concern Cannot Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Under Section 3 (23) Of IBC Code, 2016: NCLT


[ By Bobby Anthony ]

NCLT

A sole proprietary concern is not a person under Section 3(23) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and hence it cannot initiate insolvency proceedings, the Delhi bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has ruled.

Earlier, RG Steels had approached the NCLT as an operational creditor seeking initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process against corporate debtor M/s Berrys Auto Ancillaries Pvt Ltd, through a an application under Section 9.

RG Steel had contended that Berry Auto had defaulted in making payment of more than Rs 15 lakh and it submitted documents, including ledger accounts, along with copies of invoices remaining unpaid, in support of its claim.

However, Berrys Auro replied to RG Steel’s demand notice dated December 8, 2018, disputing any liability as claimed by RG Steel.

The NCLT bench stated that though the definition of a 'person' under Section 3(23) of the IBC included an 'individual', it could not be stretched to refer to a sole proprietary concern.

The NCLT bench also found a pre-existing dispute in relation to rates charged and the total debt claimed by RG Steels against Berry Auto Pvt Ltd, which was shown in the detailed reply sent by Berry Auto by way of a computational chart.

Thus, taking into account the definition of 'person' not including a 'sole proprietary concern', as well as the pre-existing dispute, the NCLT bench held that the petition by RG Steels to initiate insolvency proceedings was not maintainable.

Hence the NCLT bench dismissed the petition.

Related Post

latest News

  • Ban imposed on cricketer Sreesanth set aside by SC, BCCI asked to take fresh decision on punishment

    The Supreme Court allowed cricketer S Sreesanth’s appeal partly and set aside the life ban imposed by the Board of Control of Cricket in India(BCCI)...

    Read More
  • Bombay HC dismisses PIL challenging BMC’s decision to sever 2646 trees in Aarey

    A bench of Bombay High Court Justices Bharati Dangre and Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog dismissed all Public Interest Litigations filed by Vanashakti...

    Read More
  • PNB Scam Case: Enforcement Directorate Seizes Mehul Choksi’s Assets, Including Dubai Properties Worth Rs 24 Crore

    The Enforcement Directorate has attached properties worth Rs 24.8 crores of diamond merchant and willful defaulter Mehul Choksi, who is an accused in ...

    Read More
shares