December 07, 2017

Texas same-sex marriage case declined hearing: US SC


On December 4, US Supreme Court let stand a Texas Supreme Court ruling that did not extend spousal benefits to same-sex couples under employee insurance plans.

The case began in 2013 when Jack Pidgeon and Larry Hicks sued the city of Houston after the city’s mayor gave municipal spousal benefits, health and life insurance, to same-sex married couples. In 2015, the US Supreme Court overturned the ban on same-sex marriage. In 2016 the Texas Supreme Court ruled that the US Supreme Court decision “did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons.”

The ruling ended Pidgeon and Hicks’ case, said Texas’ 14th Court of Appeals and the city was allowed to offer spousal benefits to same-sex couples. The city appealed the case, which was denied by the US Supreme Court.

The Texas court will not take forward the case to decide whether the benefits in Houston should be stopped for same-sex couples. Houston has continued to provide benefits to all of its married employees through-out the pending litigation.

Related Post

latest News

  • SC’s poser on misuse of religion in elections

    Is it corrupt poll practice to prop up religious leaders to sway voters, asks Constitution Bench Questioning the practice of using the mass appeal

    Read More
  • Delhi HC Imposes Rs 50,000 On AIIMS For Filing A Frivolous Petition

    On April 02, a bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Deepa Sharma of the Delhi High Court imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on All India Institute of Medical S...

    Read More
  • Brian Duffy’s estate sues Hard Rock Cafe for copyright infringement

    The estate of late photographer Brian Duffy is suing Hard Rock Cafe for copyright infringement for using a photograph of British singer David Bowie, w...

    Read More