High Court (India)

September 11, 2019

Chidambaram Moves Delhi HC Seeking Bail; Challenges Lower Court’s Order Sending Him To Judicial Custody


[ By Bobby Anthony ]

P-Chidambaram

Former Finance Minister P Chidambaram moved the Delhi High Court seeking bail and challenged a lower court's order sending him to judicial custody.

He stated that the case against him is “political vendetta” since the charges against him do not even make an economic offence nor was there any loss to the exchequer nor was it a bank fraud.

In his application before the court, Chidambaram has argued that no public funds were involved in the case (INX Media case) and it is also not a case of bank fraud of taking money out of the county or defrauding depositors or stealing money from a company.

“In fact, in the present case, Rs 305 crore has come into INX Media (i.e. the investee company) as FDI, well within the approval percentage of 46.21 per cent of equity. Out of this Rs 305 crore, Rs 26 crore was invested in an Indian subsidiary company (namely INX News),” his petition stated.

It also claimed that the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) which granted the necessary clearance was chaired by the Secretary, Economic Affairs and included four other secretaries (industry, commerce, external affairs and overseas Indian affairs) as well as the secretary of the administrative ministry concerned.

The petition stated that the minister (Chidambaram) approved the file on the recommendations of the FIPB and the Secretary for Economic Affairs.

The petition said that in CBI custody, Chidambaram was confronted with the then Under Secretary R Prasad, OSD P K Bagga, Director Prabodh Saxena, Joint Secretary Anup Pujari and Additional Secretary Sindhushree Khullar, all of whom were involved in processing the FIPB file of INX Media.

“All of the aforesaid persons have affirmed the correctness of the approval granted to INX Media. Neither of them has alleged any illegality in the approval. Further, neither of them has alleged that the Petitioner (Chidambaram) had given them any directions regarding processing of the file pertaining to INX Media,” his petition stated.

His petition also stated that he (Chidambaram) cannot tamper with the evidence as all the files are with the government and claimed that he is a victim of political vendetta.

Related Post

latest News

  • Consumer Forum rules against Bata, says Charging for carry bags amounts to unfair trade practice

    Shoe manufacturer Bata cannot charge its consumers for carry bags on purchase of products, a District Consumer Disputes Redress Forum recently ruled.

    Read More
  • Puma, Forever 21 file stipulation of dismissal at US District Court

    On November 7, Puma (a German multinational company which is the third largest sportswear manufacturer in the world) and Forever 21 (an American fast ...

    Read More
  • The appellant’s own default in sleeping over his right for 14 years will not constitute a case of ‘undue hardship’ justifying extension of time for condonation of delay: SC

    A bench of Justices N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Ajay Rastogi of the Supreme Court held that it does not lie to the applicant to plead that h...

    Read More
shares