Ankur Mishra

Ankur Mishra

Ankur Mishra

From Ankur Mishra

Power To Impound Instrument After Being Taken In Evidence: Interpretation Of Section 36 Of The Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Power To Impound Instrument After Being Taken In Evidence: Interpretation Of Section 36 Of The Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Power To Impound Instrument After Being Taken In Evidence: Interpretation Of Section 36 Of The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 I. Introduction What is the legal validity of Unstamped or insufficiently...

Read Articles
‘Court’ In Section 29A Vis-à-Vis ‘Court’ In Section 2(1)(e) Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996: Analysis Of Supreme Court’s Order In Chief Engineer (NH) PWD (Roads) v. M/s BSC &C JV

‘Court’ In Section 29A Vis-à-Vis ‘Court’ In Section 2(1)(e) Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996: Analysis Of Supreme Court’s Order In Chief Engineer (NH) PWD (Roads) v. M/s BSC &C JV

‘Court’ In Section 29A Vis-à-Vis ‘Court’ In Section 2(1)(e) Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996: Analysis Of Supreme Court’s Order In Chief Engineer (NH) PWD (Roads) v. M/s BSC &C JV I....

Read Articles
Power To Modify Arbitral Award Under Section 34 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996: Analyzing The Three Judge Reference In Gayatri Balasamy V. M/S ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited

Power To Modify Arbitral Award Under Section 34 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996: Analyzing The Three Judge Reference In Gayatri Balasamy V. M/S ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited

Power To Modify Arbitral Award Under Section 34 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996: Analyzing The Three Judge Reference In Gayatri Balasamy V. M/S ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited 1....

Read Articles
Share it