• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    +
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • Freshfields
    Finance partner Carol Van der Vorst
  • Time
    Time limit of 45 days under SARFAESI is
  • Justices-Uday-Umesh-Lalit-&-Aniruddha-Bose-&-Sudhanshu-Dhulia
    Supreme Court reserves judgement on
  • Justice-Yashwant-Varma
    Delhi High Court rules on not ousting
  • Deborah-Enix-Ross
    Deborah Enix-Ross sworn in as president
  • Dentons
    Dentons assists IMC Industrial Group in
  • Bombay-High-Court
    Bombay High Court rejects recovery
  • Pallavi-Bedi
    Erstwhile Partner at Luthra and Luthra -
  • WhatsApp
    NCLAT rules in favour of WhatsAPP, says
  • Jaewoo-Lee
    Jaewoo Lee appointed as the Managing
Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking
HomeArticlesArbitration & Mediation
Arbitration & Mediation

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

By: Ajay Monga & Devmani Bansal | Law Firm SNG & Partners
19 July 2022 5:30 AM GMT

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

CAN AN ARBITRAL AWARD BE STAYED UPON SURETY AND PERSONAL UNDERTAKING The law laid down by the Hon'ble Court will also deprecate the practice of Courts to accept personal surety or undertaking, which are completely alien to civil laws Since, the overhauling of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by way of amendments carried out by Parliament in 2015, stay against arbitral award became...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


CAN AN ARBITRAL AWARD BE STAYED UPON SURETY AND PERSONAL UNDERTAKING

The law laid down by the Hon'ble Court will also deprecate the practice of Courts to accept personal surety or undertaking, which are completely alien to civil laws

Since, the overhauling of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by way of amendments carried out by Parliament in 2015, stay against arbitral award became a debatable issue. It has in fact been tested many times before many High Courts as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Still, the analogy behind granting the stay has not been followed by the Courts below. Recently, in one such case, a District Court at Betul, Madhya Pradesh, has granted the stay against the arbitral award upon the respondent furnishing the personal surety and undertaking, which not only diminishes the very object of amendments but also frustrated the scope of recovery of the arbitral award. The said matter was challenged by the Award Holder before the Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Angel Broking Limited vs. Vijay Khandelwal1.


While passing the above judgment, the Hon'ble Court also discussed the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. M/s Federal Motors (P) Limited2, wherein the Supreme Court held that "a decree for payment of money is not ordinarily stayed by the appellate Court, yet, if it exercises its jurisdiction to grant a stay in an exceptional case, it may direct the appellant to make payment of the decretal amount with interest as a condition precedent to the grant of stay."

The Hon'ble High Court also discussed the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Pam Development Private Limited vs. The State of West Bengal3, wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme court held that "Section 36 of the Arbitration Act also does not provide for any special treatment to the government while dealing with the grant of stay in an application under the proceedings of Section 34 of the Act".

Thus, this judgment is a welcome step in recognizing and reposing faith in the Arbitral process mechanism.

The Hon'ble High Court, after discussing various judgments held that "As per Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and considering Order 41 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, conditional stay can be granted subject to furnishing of security to the satisfaction of decree. The District Judge has passed an order to furnish surety and not security therefore he has acted contrary to provision of Section 36 (3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996."

The above judgment has added another milestone in encouraging the parties to seek an alternative resolution process for resolving their inter-se disputes, inasmuch as it ensures the effective satisfaction of arbitral award. Further, the law laid down by the Hon'ble Court would also deprecate the practice of Courts to accept personal surety or undertaking, which are completely alien to civil laws. Thus, this judgment is a welcome step in recognizing and reposing faith in the Arbitral process mechanism.

1 https://mphc.gov.in/upload/jabalpur/MPHCJB/2021/MP/4315/MP_4315_2021_FinalOrder_31-Jan-2022_digi.pdf
2 2005 (1) SCC 705
3 2019 (8) SCC 112

Disclaimer – The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the author and are purely informative in nature.

Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
TAGS:
  • Ajay Monga 
  • Devmani Bansal 
  • SNG & Partners 
Trending Now
Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

The Hierarchy of Indian Courts

The Hierarchy of Indian Courts

Freshfields

Finance partner Carol Van der Vorst joins Freshfields

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal

Recommended Articles
Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal

Stamping Out Illegal Streaming Technology – Recent Amendments to The Copyright Act

Stamping Out Illegal Streaming Technology – Recent

The Quincecare Duty of Care Story Continues

The Quincecare Duty of Care Story Continues

Recent Developments and Trends in Diversity & Inclusion in Japan

Recent Developments and Trends in Diversity & Inclusion in

  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X