Bijal Ajinkya

Bijal Ajinkya

Bijal Ajinkya is a Partner in the Direct Tax, Private Client Practice and Investment Funds Practice Groups in the Mumbai office. With over 20 years of experience, on the tax side, Bijal primarily focuses on international tax, structuring of inbound and outbound investments, M&A tax negotiations, providing opinions on complex tax issues on international tax, GAAR, POEM, PE, MFN, etc. Bijal has also advised on the tax and regulatory aspects of incentive plans rolled out by Indian companies and MNCs for key employees and executives in India. On the tax litigation front, she has immense experience in providing advice on unique litigation strategies and has been a lead advisor in many successful and path breaking tax litigations in India. She has also served as an expert witness on Indian tax matters in an international arbitration. She is handling a tax information exchange case which is a first precedent case on the interpretation of treaty provisions with a country in the Channel Islands. She has led many successful international tax litigations in India; on the India Mauritius Tax Treaty – Azadi Bachao Andolan, Applicability of Minimum Alternate Tax for Foreign Portfolio Investors for International Financial Associations, Taxation of Outsourcing in India for Morgan Stanley, Taxation of Online services for Dun & Bradstreet, Taxation of a Mauritius Protected Cell Company for Nicholas Applegate, to name a few.

Bijal Ajinkya

From Bijal Ajinkya

Marital Agreements In India

Marital Agreements In India

Marital Agreements In India In the Indian society, divorce is still seen as the last resort; and divorce disputes can be extremely unpleasant and traumatizing When two individuals enter into a...

Read Articles
Bombay High Court rules that monies received pursuant to an arbitral award was towards retirement from partnership, settlement of family dispute; hence, same should not be chargeable to tax

Bombay High Court rules that monies received pursuant to an arbitral award was towards retirement from partnership, settlement of family dispute; hence, same should not be chargeable to tax

Bombay High Court rules that monies received pursuant to an arbitral award was towards retirement from partnership, settlement of family dispute; hence, same should not be chargeable to tax This...

Read Articles
Pillar 2 and Tax incentives: Implications for the IFSC exemption

Pillar 2 and Tax incentives: Implications for the IFSC exemption

The objective of Pillar 2 is to discourage Multi-National Entity Groups (“MNE Groups”) from using Low Tax Jurisdictions

Read Articles
Structuring Matrimonial Liability

Structuring Matrimonial Liability

STRUCTURING MATRIMONIAL LIABILITY While we are hopeful that our society maintains the sanctity of marriage, it is always prudent to plan for the worst in order to insulate the family wealth The...

Read Articles
Share it