- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
DSK legal advised and represented CREDAI-MCHI successfully before the Supreme Court
DSK legal advised and represented CREDAI-MCHI successfully before the Supreme Court DSK legal advised and represented CREDAI-MCHI before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the captioned matter. CREDAI-MCHI is part of the Maharashtra chapter of the Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Association ("CREDAI") being the apex body of real estate developers and filed an Interim Application in Re: T....
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
DSK legal advised and represented CREDAI-MCHI successfully before the Supreme Court
DSK legal advised and represented CREDAI-MCHI before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the captioned matter. CREDAI-MCHI is part of the Maharashtra chapter of the Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Association ("CREDAI") being the apex body of real estate developers and filed an Interim Application in Re: T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v Union of India & Ors (IA NO. 1000 of 2003 in Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995) for clarification of the order dated June 3, 2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court ("June Order") with respect to the Eco-Sensitive Zone ("ESZ/s") around Tungareshwar Sanctuary.
Brief Background:
On February 9, 2011, the Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change ("MoEF & CC") framed guidelines to facilitate the States / Union Territories for declaration of ESZs around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries ("Guidelines"). As per the said Guidelines, the purpose behind declaration of ESZs was to regulate rather than prohibit certain activities around National Parks / Sanctuaries so as to minimise the negative impact of such activities on the fragile ecosystem encompassing these protected areas. The MoEF & CC had constituted an Expert Committee for considering the proposals received from the State Governments for ESZs.
In the interregnum, MOEF&CC published a draft notification for Tungareshwar Sanctuary in December 2018 calling for suggestions/objections and thereafter the final notification was issued on September 11, 2019 ("Tungareshwar Final Notification"). The ESZ in the Tungareshwar Final Notification was set as 100m to 4km. Subsequently, as no proposals were received for 21 National Parks/Wildlife Sanctuaries, vide an order dated December 11, 2018, the Hon'ble Supreme Court directed, as an interim measure, that an area of 10 kms around these 21 National Parks / Wildlife Sanctuaries (including the Flamingo Creek) be declared as an ESZ by the MoEF & CC and granted liberty to State Governments to move for modification along with the proposals ("2018 December Order").
June Order:
The June Order was passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, inter alia, directing that:
• the Guidelines are reasonable in suggesting that a 1 km boundary for Category B forests is reasonable, however subject to changes in special circumstances, and
• a direction for a mandatory 1 km boundary to be fixed for each protected national park or wildlife sanctuary.
Interim Application:
In view of the fact that the Tungareshwar Final Notification was already in force, CREDAI-MCHI filed the captioned application seeking clarification on:
(a) final ESZ notification in respect of Tungareshwar was already published by Ministry of Environment and Forest & CC on September 11, 2019, and
(b) Whilst, passing the June order this notification was inadvertently not brought to the notice of the Court and thus it remained to be carved out of the June order,
The captioned Interim Application was heard by the specially constituted Green bench comprising of Justice B R Gavai and Justice Vikram Nath on November 30, 2022 and the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass an order clarifying that the ESZ boundaries of 1 km fixed by them vide the June Order will not apply to Tungareshwar Sanctuary.
This order has brought a huge respite and relief to the real estate development sector as several large-scale projects in that area which were ongoing in accordance with the Final Notifications were halted by the Forest Department if they fell within the 1 km ESZ boundary.
Earlier the team had procured same relief for the clients in respect of Sanjay Gandhi National Park and Thane Creek Flamingo Sanctuary.
Sr. Advocate Mr. Mukul Rohatgi and a team from DSK Legal comprising of Partners - Akhil Anand and Samit Shukla and Senior Associates - Shivani Khanwilkar and Saloni Shah appeared on behalf of CREDAI-MCHI.