- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
DSK Legal Represented B62 Studios In Delhi High Court Copyright Infringement Suit
DSK Legal represented B62 Studios in Delhi High Court copyright infringement suit
The leading law firm in India, DSK Legal represented B62 Studios Private Limited before the Delhi High Court in a commercial suit filed by Trimurti Films Private Limited alleging copyright infringement of the song “Tirchi Topiwale.” The matter involved claims regarding the use of the song in the film “Dhurandhar: The Revenge,” both in its original and remixed versions. The proceedings focused on the grant of ad-interim relief sought by the plaintiff.
Case Background
The captioned Suit was filed by Trimurti Films Pvt Ltd (“Trimurti”) along with various Interim Applications against B62 Studios Private Limited (“B62”) and others alleging that the use of the song “Tirchi Topiwale” (“said Song”), in its original form as well as in a remixed version, in B62’s film titled “Dhurandhar: The Revenge” constitutes an infringement of Trimurti’s copyright in the said Song.
Court Proceedings
The captioned matter was listed for ad-interim hearing before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. After hearing the parties at length, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, vide order dated April 9, 2026, did not grant any ad-interim and/or interim injunction in favour of Trimurti and against B62 Studios Private Limited at this stage.
Next Hearing Date
The captioned matter has been adjourned to May 6, 2026.
Legal Representation
For B62 Studios Private Limited:
External Counsels: Senior Counsel Ravi Prakash, Counsel Nizam Pasha
The DSK Legal team acting on the matter comprised Parag Khandhar (Partner), Chandrima Mitra (Partner), Diva Chanchani, and Anaheeta Verma; B62 Studios Private Limited: Shweta Vora
Conclusion
The case highlights the complexities surrounding copyright claims in the entertainment industry, particularly in relation to the use of original and remixed musical works in films. The Delhi High Court’s refusal to grant interim relief at this stage underscores the importance of detailed examination of rights and evidence before restraining creative works. The matter remains pending for further adjudication.
Click to know more about DSK Legal
If you have a news or deal publication or would like to collaborate on content, columns, or article publications, connect with the Legal Era News Network Team and email us at info@legalera.in or call us on +91 8879634922.


