• Legal Era India
  • Legal Era Global
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    +
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
search-icon

Top Stories

HomeNewsFrom the Courts
25 Jan 2021 4:00 AM GMT

Allahabad High Court penalizes Amrapali Director for misusing process of Court

By Legal Era
Allahabad High Court penalizes Amrapali Director for misusing process of Court

Allahabad High Court penalizes Amrapali Director for misusing process of Court The Allahabad High Court recently imposed penalty of Rs. 50,000 on Amrapali Group's Director, Ajay Kumar for his attempts to subvert and misuse the process of the Court instead of surrendering before the Court as ordered earlier. A modification application was filed by the applicant seeking to modify the order...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans

Allahabad High Court penalizes Amrapali Director for misusing process of Court

The Allahabad High Court recently imposed penalty of Rs. 50,000 on Amrapali Group's Director, Ajay Kumar for his attempts to subvert and misuse the process of the Court instead of surrendering before the Court as ordered earlier.

A modification application was filed by the applicant seeking to modify the order dated 18th September, 2020 by which the High Court had rejected his interim bail granted earlier.

The applicant (Ajay Kumar) is involved in the Rs 6,000 crores Amrapali mega scam and a case proceeding under Section 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 was pending against him and others co-accused in the Court of Special Judge/ Session Judge Lucknow.

In addition to this, another order passed in the matter on 3rd December, 2020, Kumar was expected to surrender immediately before the trial court after the two months/ sixty-day period was over i.e., on or before December 31, 2020.

Following the instant modification application, the High Court pointed that the whole effort of the accused-applicant was to avoid a particular Bench and get the matter listed before the Bench which passed the order in September, by cleverly drafting the application without annexing the final order dated 3rdDecember, 2020.

"Order dated 3rd December, 2020 has not been annexed. However, order dated 18th September, 2020 is annexed with the application. This was deliberately done to avoid the listing of the bail application before the Bench which has passed the final order dated 3rd December, 2020", the Bench stated.

The High Court further pointed that, "The first time when the matter got listed before this Bench on 12th January, 2021, an effort was made to get the matter delisted and an office report was engineered from a dealing clerk to the effect that the matter was wrongly listed before this Bench".

"Considering the aforesaid, this Court is of the view that the accused/applicant instead of surrendering before the Court on or before 31st December, 2020, has tried to subvert and misuse the process of the Court and has filed a nonmaintainable application before this Court."

Since the accused-applicant had tried to subvert and misuse the process of the Court and interfered with the course of justice, the Court opined that it would be appropriate to impose a cost of Rs.50,000/- to be deposited by the applicant with Oudh Bar Association within a period of two weeks from the date of order i.e., 13th January, 2021

With these observations, the Court found the application to be non-maintainable and was thus rejected the same with costs.


Click to download here Full Order


Next Story
TAGS:
  • #Allahabad High Court
  • #Oudh Bar Association
  • #money laundering
  • #Amrapali
  • #Bail
Similar Posts
Trending Now
Recommended Articles
  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2023© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X