• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    +
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • Freshfields
    Finance partner Carol Van der Vorst
  • Time
    Time limit of 45 days under SARFAESI is
  • Justices-Uday-Umesh-Lalit-&-Aniruddha-Bose-&-Sudhanshu-Dhulia
    Supreme Court reserves judgement on
  • Justice-Yashwant-Varma
    Delhi High Court rules on not ousting
  • Deborah-Enix-Ross
    Deborah Enix-Ross sworn in as president
  • Dentons
    Dentons assists IMC Industrial Group in
  • Bombay-High-Court
    Bombay High Court rejects recovery
  • Pallavi-Bedi
    Erstwhile Partner at Luthra and Luthra -
  • WhatsApp
    NCLAT rules in favour of WhatsAPP, says
  • Jaewoo-Lee
    Jaewoo Lee appointed as the Managing
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
6 July 2022 6:30 AM GMT

Andhra High Court rules in favour of BookMyShow

By Legal Era
Andhra High Court rules in favour of BookMyShow

Andhra High Court rules in favour of BookMyShow The Bench comprised of Chief Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice DVSS Somayajul The Andhra Pradesh High Court recently issued an interim order in the case of Bigtree Entertainment Pvt Ltd v State of Andhra Pradesh stopping the state government from selling movie tickets through a government-run platform until 27 July. The...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


Andhra High Court rules in favour of BookMyShow

The Bench comprised of Chief Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice DVSS Somayajul

The Andhra Pradesh High Court recently issued an interim order in the case of Bigtree Entertainment Pvt Ltd v State of Andhra Pradesh stopping the state government from selling movie tickets through a government-run platform until 27 July.

The Petition was filed by Bigtree Entertainment Private Limited (BookMyShow), the Multiplex Association of India, and Vijayawada Exhibitors' Association challenging the launch of the government-run portal, arguing that the government platform would deny a level playing field to private ticket booking businesses.

The Court was of the opinion that significant harm would be caused to the Petitioners if an interim order is not issued at this stage, as third-party agreements with platforms like BookMyShow are at risk of being affected. Additionally, it was noted that theatre owners risk their licenses being canceled if they don't migrate to the government portal by July 2.

A Government Order issued on 2 June under Rule 17(a) of Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Rules 1970, stated that ticket aggregators and cinema theatres who were selling tickets through their respective online platforms would be allowed to continue such business only through the gateway created by the government's Andhra Pradesh State Film Television and Theatre Development Corporation (APSFTVTDC), at a service charge not exceeding 2% on the rate of admission. The last date for the same was 2 July 2022.

The Court noted that through the government run-portal, the customers would be required to pay 2% ticket cost and service charge.

The Petitioners made out a more than prima facie case. The Advocate General argued that the entire expertise is in the public interest and fixing the rates of admission is an integral part of the regularization of cinemas. However, it was observed by the court that the Government's power to regulate this area requires further perusal. The court in its order also noted whether the government has the power to regulate "incidental services which are being provided to the cine-goer by third-party aggregators and others" under the Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act needs to be looked into.

The Government's step was in the direction of keeping a check on black marketing, tax evasion, and collection of GST and service taxes. However, this was opposed on the grounds that the Government has ample power to curb such practices. The counsel argued that the new law in the form of the Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) (Amendment) Act 2021 and the rules issued in the form of a government order is a way to gain control over the online booking system by the state government.

In light of the observations made by the Court, an interim order was passed till 27 July 2022 when the final hearing of the case is scheduled.

TAGS:
  • Andhra Pradesh High Court 
  • interim order 
  • Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) (Amendment) Act 2021 
  • BookMyShow 
  • movie tickets 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
TAGS:
  • Andhra Pradesh High Court 
  • interim order 
  • Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) (Amendment) Act 2021 
  • BookMyShow 
  • movie tickets 
Trending Now
Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

The Hierarchy of Indian Courts

The Hierarchy of Indian Courts

Freshfields

Finance partner Carol Van der Vorst joins Freshfields

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal

Recommended Articles
Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal

Stamping Out Illegal Streaming Technology – Recent Amendments to The Copyright Act

Stamping Out Illegal Streaming Technology – Recent

The Quincecare Duty of Care Story Continues

The Quincecare Duty of Care Story Continues

Recent Developments and Trends in Diversity & Inclusion in Japan

Recent Developments and Trends in Diversity & Inclusion in

  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X