• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • NCLT
    Debt owed by one Partner does not make
  • DSK Legal advised CARE in relation to the acquisition of CHL group
    DSK Legal advised CARE in relation to
  • Tax
    ITAT rules on TDS credit not being
  • RBI
    RBI slaps fine on Kotak and IndusInd
  • Capital-Loss
    ITAT rules on expenditure claims in a
  • Income-Tax-Act
    Madras High Court rules on remand
  • CBIRC approves Goldman Sachs-ICBC launch of wealth management joint venture
    CBIRC approves Goldman Sachs-ICBC launch
  • Pranav-Atit
    Pranav Atit joins Trilegal on leaving
  • McDermott
    McDermott appoints eight IP partners to
  • SEBI
    SEBI fines PGIM AMC, its CEO Ajit Menon,
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
4 April 2022 5:45 AM GMT

Calcutta High Court rules against re-assessment under the IT Act

By Legal Era
Calcutta High Court rules against re-assessment under the IT Act

Calcutta High Court rules against re-assessment under the IT Act It held that the assessing officer could initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with the law The Calcutta High Court has held that the re-assessment passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961 without the application of mind was not sustainable under the law. The petitioner, Realization Stock & Equity Private Limited...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


Calcutta High Court rules against re-assessment under the IT Act

It held that the assessing officer could initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with the law

The Calcutta High Court has held that the re-assessment passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961 without the application of mind was not sustainable under the law.

The petitioner, Realization Stock & Equity Private Limited had challenged the impugned notice of March 2021 under the IT Act relating to the Assessment Year 2017-18 and the subsequent notice of January 2022. It contended that those were issued with non-application of mind and hence, not sustainable in law.

Justice Mohammad Nizamuddin observed that one of the reasons for the re-opening of the assessment was that no regular assessment of the IT Act was made. This was totally incorrect and contrary to the respondent's own record where it appeared that the regular assessment of the writ petition was passed in December 2019.

Thus, quashing the order, the court observed, "The court, in the exercise of the Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction under the Constitution of India, is very reluctant to interfere with the sufficiency of the findings and reasoning of the recorded reason for the purpose of reopening of any assessment. But, since it is a case of patent non-application of mind by the assessing officer, all subsequent proceedings are quashed."

However, it added, "It will not prevent the assessing officer concerned from initiating any fresh proceedings in accordance with the law."

TAGS:
  • Calcutta High Court 
  • Justice Mohammad Nizamuddin 
  • Income Tax Act 
  • Constitution of India 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
Recommended Articles
Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition Regulation

Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in India

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in

From General Counsel to Independent Director

From General Counsel to Independent Director

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X