- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
CCI Probe into Ad Agencies: Madison Communications Moves Delhi High Court
CCI Probe into Ad Agencies: Madison Communications Moves Delhi High Court
Introduction
Madison Communications has moved the Delhi High Court seeking to quash the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) ongoing antitrust investigation targeting the advertising agency.
Factual Background
The CCI investigation was initiated based on information submitted under its leniency programme, with Dentsu reportedly providing key inputs. The investigation alleges that multiple leading agencies may have coordinated pricing strategies through informal channels.
Procedural Background
Madison Communications filed a petition with the Delhi High Court on October 8, challenging the CCI investigation and seeking to quash it. The petition outlines grievances over procedural irregularities during the investigation.
Contentions of the Parties
Madison Communications: The agency alleges procedural irregularities during the CCI's investigation, including questioning of senior executives without legal representation and limited access to documents seized during the search operations.
CCI: The CCI investigation reportedly found that multiple leading agencies may have coordinated pricing strategies through informal channels, including messaging platforms.
Issues
1. Procedural Irregularities: Whether the CCI's investigation was conducted in a fair and transparent manner.
2. Antitrust Investigation: Whether the CCI has sufficient grounds to continue its investigation into Madison Communications.
Possible Outcomes
The Delhi High Court may either:
- Admit Madison's plea and schedule a detailed hearing
- Reject the petition
- Temporarily stay the ongoing investigation while considering the agency's challenge
Implications
The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the advertising sector in India, particularly with regards to antitrust investigations and procedural fairness.



