• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • CAM
    CAM advises DFC for External Commercial
  • CAM acts for SBI on 15,727 crores transaction with Jindal Steel
    CAM acts for SBI on 15,727 crores
  • Insolvency
    SEBI Cannot initiate proceedings against
  • Sullivan-&-Cromwell-Freshfields
    Sullivan & Cromwell, Freshfields advise
  • Werner-Eyskens
    Crowell & Moring adds Werner Eyskens in
  • Chris-Fletcher
    Chris Fletcher joins Infinium Logistics
  • Umera-Ali
    Dentons appoints Umera Ali as a partner
  • NCLAT
    NCLAT stays the Constitution of the
  • Uber-&-Lyft
    Class Action Suit filed against Uber,
  • Ashurst-ABL
    Ashurst, ABL advise on Superhero -
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
17 Jun 2022 3:30 AM GMT

Copyright Infringement, a Cognizable and Non-bailable offence: Supreme Court of India

By: Richa Jain
Justices-MR-Shah-and-BV-Nagarathna


Copyright Infringement, a Cognizable and Non-bailable offence: Supreme Court of India

"The language of the provision in Part II of First Schedule is very clear and there is no ambiguity whatsoever."

The Supreme Court of India in a landmark judgment held that Copyright infringement under Section 63 is a cognizable and non-bailable offence.

The Delhi High Court earlier held that offences under Section 63 are non-cognizable, pursuant to which a writ petition was filed in the Supreme Court to challenge the aforesaid decision.

Imprisonment under Section 63 is for a period not less than six months which may extend to three years. Addressing this section along with Part II of Schedule 1 of CrPC, it was observed that imprisonment of less than three years with a fine is a non-cognizable offence, however, imprisonment of three years extending to seven years is a cognizable and non-bailable offence.

During the appeal, the appellant contended that the High Court committed a grave error in holding that offences under Section 63 of the Copyright Act are non-cognizable and that such offences do not fall under the purview of Part II of the first schedule.

Upon hearing the contentions of both parties, the two-judge bench of Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna noted that the maximum punishment under Section 63 is for 3 years, hence a magistrate may sentence an accused to an imprisonment of 3 years.

It was held that:

"Thus, for the offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, the punishment provided is imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to three years and with fine. Therefore, the maximum punishment which can be imposed would be three years. Therefore, the learned Magistrate may sentence the accused to three years also. In that view of the matter considering Part II of the First Schedule of the Cr.P.C., if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for three years and onwards but not more than seven years the offence is a cognizable offence. Only in a case where the offence is punishable for imprisonment for less than three years or with fine only the offence can be said to be non-cognizable"

The Court placed reliance on Rakesh Kumar Paul vs. the State of Assam and noted that:

"In view of the above clear position of law, the decision in the case of Rakesh Kumar Paul (supra) relied upon by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 shall not be applicable to the facts of the case on hand."

While allowing the present appeal the court made its final remarks:

"Consequently, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court taking a contrary view is hereby quashed and set aside and…… the offence under Sections 63 & 64 of the Copyright Act now shall be proceeded further in accordance with law and on its own merits treating the same as a cognizable and non-bailable offence"

Richa Jain

Richa Jain

TAGS:
  • Supreme Court of India 
  • Delhi High Court 
  • Copyright 
  • Sections 63 & 64 of the Copyright Act 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
Tax on Alimony

Tax on Alimony

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

CAM

CAM advises DFC for External Commercial Borrowing

Insolvency Procedure For MSMEs?

Insolvency Procedure For MSMEs?

Recommended Articles
Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition Regulation

Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in India

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in

From General Counsel to Independent Director

From General Counsel to Independent Director

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X