Delhi High Court Calls AI A "Dangerous Tool," Seeks Government's Response On PIL Against DeepSeek
Delhi High Court Calls AI A "Dangerous Tool," Seeks Government's Response On PIL Against DeepSeek
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday observed that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a dangerous tool, regardless of who possesses it, emphasizing that it makes no difference whether such technology is in American or Chinese hands.
A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela made the remarks while directing the counsel for the Union government to seek instructions regarding a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed against Chinese AI company DeepSeek.
The order came after the government’s counsel stated that the matter requires consideration. "AI is a dangerous tool in anybody's hands, whether it is Chinese or American; it doesn’t make a difference. The government is well aware of these issues," Justice Gedela remarked.
The PIL raised concerns over privacy and security risks associated with DeepSeek. The Court, at the outset, inquired about the statutory framework for blocking such platforms. The government’s counsel responded that the issue was under consideration, prompting the Court to consider disposing of the petition. However, since there was no clarity on whether the matter was already being reviewed or required fresh consideration, the Court adjourned the case to allow the government time to obtain full instructions.
During the hearing, when the petitioner’s counsel argued that the matter involved a direct infringement of privacy rights, Justice Gedela remarked on the prevalence of data vulnerabilities. "You are in dark web 97%. What are you saying? You are next generation youngsters. You know more about it than us. You think this data; any data is safe? Are you aware of dark web. Are you aware that 97% of the iceberg is tilted around. Are you aware of that? So therefore, they are saying consideration ... we are giving them an opportunity, please wait." he said.
Granting the government an opportunity to respond, the Court listed the matter for further hearing on February 20.
