• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • CAM
    CAM advises DFC for External Commercial
  • CAM acts for SBI on 15,727 crores transaction with Jindal Steel
    CAM acts for SBI on 15,727 crores
  • Insolvency
    SEBI Cannot initiate proceedings against
  • Sullivan-&-Cromwell-Freshfields
    Sullivan & Cromwell, Freshfields advise
  • Werner-Eyskens
    Crowell & Moring adds Werner Eyskens in
  • Chris-Fletcher
    Chris Fletcher joins Infinium Logistics
  • Umera-Ali
    Dentons appoints Umera Ali as a partner
  • NCLAT
    NCLAT stays the Constitution of the
  • Uber-&-Lyft
    Class Action Suit filed against Uber,
  • Ashurst-ABL
    Ashurst, ABL advise on Superhero -
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
21 Jun 2022 7:30 AM GMT

Delhi High Court retains rogue websites from using Amazon's trademark and logo

By Legal Era
Amazon


Delhi High Court retains rogue websites from using Amazon's trademark and logo

"the activities of the Rogue Defendants are leading to a financial loss to the innocent and unsuspecting members of the public" as noted by the Court.

The Delhi High Court recently restrained several rogue websites from using the trademark Amazon or its logos or any deceptive variant which would lead to financial losses to the public.

It was stated that the rogue websites and their social media accounts were created to defraud the innocents and make them pay for registration fees at 'Amazon Easy.' The fake website was created by the defendant wherein the interested parties would be required to register for an Amazon Easy Story and get in touch with the Amazon Easy Marketing team.

The single-judge bench of Justice Jyoti Singh observed that this was a pre-planned conspiracy to defraud and use innocent members of the public.

It was noted by the Court, "It is averred that the Rogue Defendants have engaged in these infringing and deceptive activities to defraud innocent members of the public who are interested in registering as an 'Amazon Easy Store'"

It was further observed that the rogue websites reproduced the contents posted by Amazon and also adopted the look and feel of the original website.

"It is averred that the Rogue Defendants reach out to innocent and gullible members of the public who are interested in registering as an 'Amazon Easy Store' and swindle money from them on the pretext that such monies are being collected as part of the registration process for setting up an 'Amazon Easy Store'. The Rogue Defendants are attempting to lure unsuspecting members under the false pretext of offering to register them as an 'Amazon Easy Store', in the name of the Plaintiffs"

By virtue of the long and continuous use of the Plaintiff's trademarks and in the light of the observations made, the Court restrained the Defendant from using the marks AMAZON, AMAZON.in, or in any other manner until the next hearing.

Additionally, the Court also directed to suspend fake Facebook and Instagram accounts of the rogue Defendants.

Ministry of Department of Telecommunications and Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) is directed to issue notifications calling upon the various internet and telecom service providers registered under it to block access to the various websites/Rogue Defendants identified by the Plaintiffs in the plaint.

TAGS:
  • Delhi High Court 
  • Amazon 
  • rogue websites 
  • Ministry of Department of Telecommunications and Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
Tax on Alimony

Tax on Alimony

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

Insolvency Procedure For MSMEs?

Insolvency Procedure For MSMEs?

CAM

CAM advises DFC for External Commercial Borrowing

Recommended Articles
Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition Regulation

Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in India

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in

From General Counsel to Independent Director

From General Counsel to Independent Director

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X