• Legal Era India
  • Legal Era Global
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    +
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
search-icon

Top Stories

HomeNewsFrom the Courts
12 March 2021 9:15 AM GMT

Delhi High Court urges Centre to expeditiously implement Supreme Court's Direction on Establishment of National Tribunals Commission

By Legal Era
Delhi High Court urges Centre to expeditiously implement Supreme Courts Direction on Establishment of National Tribunals Commission

Delhi High Court urges Centre to expeditiously implement Supreme Court's Direction on Establishment of National Tribunals Commission The Delhi High Court (HC) was dealing with a petition filed in the matter of R Subramanian (Petitioner) v. Union of India (Respondents) wherein the petitioner was seeking various reliefs regarding the functioning of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans

Delhi High Court urges Centre to expeditiously implement Supreme Court's Direction on Establishment of National Tribunals Commission

The Delhi High Court (HC) was dealing with a petition filed in the matter of R Subramanian (Petitioner) v. Union of India (Respondents) wherein the petitioner was seeking various reliefs regarding the functioning of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and constitution/appointment of its various benches.

The single-judge Court of Justice Prathiba M Singh observed that there have been more than three months since the Supreme Court's (SC) judgment was delivered. It urged the Union to expeditiously implement the SC's judgment wherein the Top Court had directed for the establishment of the National Tribunals Commission to supervise the appointments to and functioning of Tribunals.


The HC stated in its order that "It only needs to be emphasized that the directions given by the Supreme Court ought to be implemented expeditiously by the Respondent – Authorities."


Advocate R Subramanian argued before the HC that the appointments to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) were considerably delayed. He added that there is a heavy caseload and there were only nineteen judicial members and twenty-two technical members across all NCLTs in India.


The petitioner sought a direction to the Union to forthwith assess the requirement of the number of Tribunals, based on analysis of the relevant variables including the case filing load and the planned disposal times.


The respondents submitted that the issues raised by the petitioner had already been covered by the Apex Court in the matter of Madras Bar Association v. Union of India & Anr. in November 2020.


The Union added that the SC had directed the formation of a National Tribunals Commission to take care of the administrative and infrastructural needs of Tribunals. It submitted that the Apex Court gave directions regarding the constitution of the 'Tribunals wing' in the Ministry of Finance. It would deal with and finalize requirements of all Tribunals till the National Tribunals Commission is established.


The respondents contended that the Top Court has already covered the said issue in detail that is raised by the petitioner.


The HC while disposing of the petition directed the Union to implement the directions given by the Top Court on its judgment in an expeditious manner.


Click to download here Full Order


Next Story
TAGS:
  • Supreme Court
  • National Tribunals Commission
  • Tribunal Wing Expeditiously
  • Delhi High Court
  • Justice Prathiba M Singh; NCLAT; NCLT
Similar Posts
Trending Now
Recommended Articles
  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2023© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X