• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • Ajay-Shaw-&-Rimali-Batra
    DSK Legal advised Ministry of Railways
  • Anagram-Partners
    Anagram Partners advised Lodha Group on
  • L&L-Partners
    L&L Partners gung-ho on green
  • Gautam-Gandotra-&-Arnav-Shah
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised
  • Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas
    Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advised
  • Adani
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and AZB act on
  • GSTN
    GSTN provides an interim solution due to
  • Central-Excise-Act
    CESTAT rules on refund claims under the
  • Calcutta-High-Court
    Calcutta High Court rejects order on ITC
  • GST
    Allahabad High Court stays GST on
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
18 Jan 2022 6:15 AM GMT

Filing physical tax audit reports impractical: CBDT tells High Court

By: Nilima Pathak
Filing physical tax audit reports impractical: CBDT tells High Court

Filing physical tax audit reports impractical: CBDT tells High Court Chartered accountants have highlighted the difficulties faced due to the technical glitches in the IT e-filing portal The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has told the Gujarat High Court that physical filing of the tax audit reports and Income Tax (IT) Returns is not feasible. A petition filed by the...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


Filing physical tax audit reports impractical: CBDT tells High Court

Chartered accountants have highlighted the difficulties faced due to the technical glitches in the IT e-filing portal

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has told the Gujarat High Court that physical filing of the tax audit reports and Income Tax (IT) Returns is not feasible.

A petition filed by the Southern Gujarat Income Tax Bar Association sought to submit physical copies of the tax returns and audit reports. The petition also requested to extend the submission date for the same. It pursued not to levy interest or penalty on the belated filings owing to glitches in the IT e-portal.

Recently, the tax department had extended the submission dates for filing of IT returns and audit reports for the assessment year 2021-22.

Various groups of chartered accountants filed representations highlighting the difficulties faced in e-filing the tax reports due to the technical glitches in the portal.

On behalf of CBDT, senior advocate Manish Bhatt informed that, unlike the Goods and Services Tax (GST) returns, physical filing of tax audit reports and income tax returns would not be possible, as the e-portal captures only digital figures.

Moreover, the portal had helpline numbers along with a multi-layered grievance cell. If any taxpayer was facing technical issues with the portal, he could contact the helpline, he said.

However, a bench headed by Justice J B Pardiwala stated, "The helpline is not helping. That is what the petitioners are saying."

"As a writ court, we are finding it difficult to tell the ministry to accept returns in a manual (physical) form. It is a policy decision," the court maintained.

Nilima Pathak

Nilima Pathak

TAGS:
  • Gujarat High Court 
  • Justice J B Pardiwala 
  • Income Tax Bar Association 
  • Goods and Services Tax 
  • Central Board of Direct Taxes 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
Adrianus-Schoorl

Wizz Financial hires White & Case partner

Ajay-Shaw-&-Rimali-Batra

DSK Legal advised Ministry of Railways in Make in India'

Tax on Alimony

Tax on Alimony

Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advised BRLMs on the IPO of LIC

Recommended Articles
  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X