- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- AI
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- ESG
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- AI
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- ESG
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Green Channel Merger Notification For INSCO Valid, Says CCI; Supreme Court Approves Resolution Plan

Green Channel Merger Notification For INSCO Valid, Says CCI; Supreme Court Approves Resolution Plan
Introduction
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has dismissed a complaint filed by AGI Greenpac Ltd. against Independent Sugar Corporation Ltd. (INSCO) regarding its green channel merger notification in the insolvency matter of Hindustan National Glass & Industries Ltd. (HNGIL).
Factual Background
AGI Greenpac alleged that INSCO made false statements or suppressed material facts in its merger filing. However, the CCI reviewed the materials and clarifications submitted by INSCO and concluded that there was no case of willful suppression or misrepresentation.
Procedural Background
The CCI considered the clarification given by INSCO and based on the material available on record, dismissed AGI's complaint. The Commission added that no further communication would be entertained in this regard.
Issues Involved
1. Green Channel Merger Notification: Whether INSCO's green channel merger notification was valid.
2. Allegations of False Statements: Whether INSCO made false statements or suppressed material facts in its merger filing.
Contentions of the Parties
AGI Greenpac's Contentions: AGI alleged procedural lapses and claimed INSCO's unilateral filing violated Regulation 5A of the CCI's Combination Regulations.
INSCO's Contentions: INSCO's merger filing was deemed valid by the CCI after reviewing submitted materials and clarifications.
Reasoning and Analysis
The CCI's decision highlights the importance of accurate data disclosures in regulatory mechanisms. The Supreme Court's judgment emphasized that discrepancies in operational capacity data compromise the CCI's decision-making process. The court observed that the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) failed to properly scrutinize these discrepancies, undermining the resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Competition Act.
Supreme Court's Judgment
The Supreme Court of India dismissed review petitions filed by AGI Greenpac and Exclusive Capital, reaffirming its earlier judgment that set aside AGI Greenpac's resolution plan due to legal and procedural non-compliance. The court directed the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kolkata to approve INSCO's resolution plan within six weeks.
Final Decision
The CCI dismissed AGI's complaint, and the Supreme Court upheld INSCO's resolution plan for HNGIL. INSCO has agreed to comply with the Supreme Court's directions, potentially paving the way for a swift resolution process. If the NCLT adheres to the timeline, a final order on INSCO's resolution plan could be issued by the end of June or early July.
Implications
The judgment underscores the significance of transparent and accurate data disclosures in regulatory mechanisms, ensuring the integrity of the CCI's decision-making process.