• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    +
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • Freshfields
    Finance partner Carol Van der Vorst
  • Time
    Time limit of 45 days under SARFAESI is
  • Justices-Uday-Umesh-Lalit-&-Aniruddha-Bose-&-Sudhanshu-Dhulia
    Supreme Court reserves judgement on
  • Justice-Yashwant-Varma
    Delhi High Court rules on not ousting
  • Deborah-Enix-Ross
    Deborah Enix-Ross sworn in as president
  • Dentons
    Dentons assists IMC Industrial Group in
  • Bombay-High-Court
    Bombay High Court rejects recovery
  • Pallavi-Bedi
    Erstwhile Partner at Luthra and Luthra -
  • WhatsApp
    NCLAT rules in favour of WhatsAPP, says
  • Jaewoo-Lee
    Jaewoo Lee appointed as the Managing
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
17 Feb 2022 3:00 AM GMT

Gujarat High Court rejects provisional attachment of goods

By: Nilima Pathak
Gujarat High Court rejects provisional attachment of goods

Gujarat High Court rejects provisional attachment of goods The applicant dealt in MS scrap used for manufacturing TMT bars The Gujarat High Court has refused to approve provisional attachment of goods when the entire stock has been pledged and the floating charge has been created. The division bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Nisha M Thakore did not approve of it...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


Gujarat High Court rejects provisional attachment of goods

The applicant dealt in MS scrap used for manufacturing TMT bars

The Gujarat High Court has refused to approve provisional attachment of goods when the entire stock has been pledged and the floating charge has been created.

The division bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Nisha M Thakore did not approve of it particularly when the entire stock and receivables were pledged and a floating charge had been created in favor of the Kalupur Commercial Bank Limited. It had been done for the purpose of availing the cash credit facility with the provisional attachment of the goods, stock and receivables; else, the entire business would come to a standstill.

The writ applicant, Utkarsh Spat LLP is a limited liability partnership firm engaged in the business of procuring various types of mild steel (MS) scrap that is used for the manufacturing of the Thermo Mechanically Treated (TMT) bars. The writ applicant is registered under the (GST) Goods and Services Tax Act and its principal place of business is at Rajkot.

The officials of the GST department undertook the search proceedings at the registered premises of the applicant and also at the residential premises of one of the partners Niraj Jaydev Arya under the (CGST) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The proceedings were undertaken on the allegation that the applicant had availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the basis of fake invoices issued by fictitious firms without any movement of goods by the firms for the period of May 2019 till the date of the search proceedings.

During the pendency of the search proceedings, the respondent passed an order provisionally attaching multiple properties like the factory premises, plant and machinery and bank accounts including the fixed deposits.

Nilima Pathak

Nilima Pathak

TAGS:
  • Gujarat High Court 
  • Justice JB Pardiwala 
  • Justice Nisha M.Thakore 
  • Goods and Services Tax Act 
  • Input Tax Credit 
  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act 
  • Rajkot 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
TAGS:
  • Gujarat High Court 
  • Justice JB Pardiwala 
  • Justice Nisha M.Thakore 
  • Goods and Services Tax Act 
  • Input Tax Credit 
  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act 
  • Rajkot 
Trending Now
Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

The Hierarchy of Indian Courts

The Hierarchy of Indian Courts

Freshfields

Finance partner Carol Van der Vorst joins Freshfields

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal

Recommended Articles
  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X