• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • DSK-Legal
    Baker's Dozen raises fund from Fireside
  • Google
    Karnataka High Court grants extension to
  • Justice-Ashok-Bhushan
    NCLAT upholds NTPC's eligibility as
  • BookMyShow
    Andhra High Court rules in favour of
  • Axel-Schilder-&-Andrew-Brereton
    King & Spalding hires new managing
  • ITAT
    ITAT rules on deemed dividends to
  • CureVac
    CureVac obtains patent lawsuit against
  • Software
    ITAT rules on software-related services
  • Tax
    ITAT rules that development fees can be
  • Karnataka-High-Court
    Karnataka High Court doors knocked on by
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
21 Feb 2022 2:30 PM GMT

Gujarat High Court rules in favor of the taxpayer

By Legal Era
Gujarat High Court rules in favor of the taxpayer

Gujarat High Court rules in favor of the taxpayer A technical glitch in the Goods and Services Tax Network portal is the responsibility of the concerned authorities The Gujarat High Court has held that a taxpayer entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) should not be deprived of the claim due to a technical glitch in the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) portal. The division bench...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


Gujarat High Court rules in favor of the taxpayer

A technical glitch in the Goods and Services Tax Network portal is the responsibility of the concerned authorities

The Gujarat High Court has held that a taxpayer entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) should not be deprived of the claim due to a technical glitch in the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) portal.

The division bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Nisha M Thakore ruled that it was within the capacity of the department to resolve the issue.

The department tried to upload the ITC – 01 Form, but due to a technical glitch in the GSTN portal, the concerned authority was unable to do so. Thereafter, it inquired with the Electronic Data Processing (EDP) cell, Gujarat. In turn, the latter asked the assistant commissioner to inform the GSTN through a nodal officer. But even after doing so, the issue remained unresolved.

Though the court said that even the writ applicant, Ezzy Electricals was also at fault, as while trying to upload the Form, it appeared that a wrong offline tool was used. It was evident from the affidavit-in-reply filed by the department.

However, the bench noted that Uchit Sheth, the counsel appearing for the writ applicant, was right in his submission. Sheth had said that if at the outset the department had brought the issue of using the wrong offline tool to his client's notice, probably, something could have been done.

The court said that it was now for the respondents to ensure that the writ applicant was permitted to upload the Form so as to enable him to claim the ITC worth Rs.5 lakh approximately under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act.

TAGS:
  • Gujarat High Court 
  • Justice JB Pardiwala 
  • Justice Nisha M Thakore 
  • Input Tax Credit 
  • Goods and Services Tax Network 
  • Goods and Services Tax Act 
  • Electronic Data Processing 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
Rajiv-Luthra

Rajiv Luthra dissolves L&L Partners litigation arm

ITAT

ITAT rules on deemed dividends to non-shareholders

Tax on Alimony

Tax on Alimony

DSK-Legal

Baker's Dozen raises fund from Fireside Ventures with the

Recommended Articles
Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition Regulation

Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in India

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in

From General Counsel to Independent Director

From General Counsel to Independent Director

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X