- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- AI
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- ESG
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- AI
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- ESG
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses PIL Against Religare; Makes Way For AGM

Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses PIL Against Religare; Makes Way For AGM
It has cleared the way for the Burman family to pursue a controlling stake in the company
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against Religare Enterprises, which obstructed its Annual General Meeting (AGM).
The division bench of Chief Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Vivek Jain ruled that the petitioner, Vijayant Mishra was not a Religare shareholder, hence not an aggrieved party. Also, the court lacked jurisdiction.
This decision lifted the 18 December 2024 stay imposed on the AGM following a PIL. The court granted the petitioner the liberty to approach an appropriate forum.
The PIL raised concerns over the proposed takeover of Religare by Dabur India’s Burman family, alleging potential adverse effects on minority shareholders. The AGM, scheduled for 31 December, was stayed pending further orders.
Representing the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, argued that the PIL was not maintainable as the petitioner was not a shareholder and the court lacked the jurisdiction.
He emphasized that the SEBI and the RBI had already provided regulatory approvals for the open offer.
The court’s decision allows the company to proceed with the AGM, including the reappointment of Rashmi Saluja as a director. It allows the Burman family to initiate their proposed acquisition of a controlling stake in Religare.