- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
Madras High Court Grants Interim Relief to Ravi Mohan Studios, Allows Use of 'BROCODE' as Film Title
Madras High Court Grants Interim Relief to Ravi Mohan Studios, Allows Use of 'BROCODE' as Film Title
Introduction
The Madras High Court has granted interim relief to Ravi Mohan Studios, allowing them to use the title "BROCODE" for their upcoming movie despite a trademark infringement threat from Indo Bevs Pvt Ltd, an alcoholic beverage company.
Factual Background
Ravi Mohan Studios planned to release a movie titled "BROCODE" and had already promoted it on various platforms. However, Indo Bevs Pvt Ltd claimed trademark rights, having applied for copyright registration for the term "BROCODE", and objected to the film's title.
Issues
- Whether Ravi Mohan Studios can use the title "BROCODE" for their movie without infringing on Indo Bevs Pvt Ltd's trademark rights?
- Whether the court should grant interim relief to Ravi Mohan Studios?
Contentions of the Parties
Plaintiff's Contentions: Ravi Mohan Studios argued that they had already promoted the movie and that the defendant's trademark application was pending with objections.
Defendant's Contentions: Indo Bevs Pvt Ltd claimed trademark rights and objected to the use of "BROCODE" for the movie.
Reasoning and Analysis
The bench of Justice V Lakshminarayanan found prima facie in favor of Ravi Mohan Studios, noting that the defendant's trademark application was pending with objections and that the plaintiff had already invested in promoting the movie. The court granted interim relief, allowing the movie to proceed with the title "BROCODE" without interference.
Decision
The Madras High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Ravi Mohan Studios, allowing them to use the title "BROCODE" for their movie for a period of three weeks, subject to serving notice to the defendant.
Implications
The judgment provides temporary relief to Ravi Mohan Studios, enabling them to proceed with their movie project without immediate disruption. The court's decision highlights the importance of considering prior use and promotional efforts in trademark disputes.



