• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • Ajay-Shaw-&-Rimali-Batra
    DSK Legal advised Ministry of Railways
  • Cyril-Amarchand-Mangaldas
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised Adani
  • Anagram-Partners
    Anagram Partners advised Lodha Group on
  • L&L-Partners
    L&L Partners gung-ho on green
  • Gautam-Gandotra-&-Arnav-Shah
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised
  • Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas
    Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advised
  • Adani
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and AZB act on
  • GSTN
    GSTN provides an interim solution due to
  • Central-Excise-Act
    CESTAT rules on refund claims under the
  • Calcutta-High-Court
    Calcutta High Court rejects order on ITC
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
17 Jan 2022 12:00 PM GMT

Supreme Court ready to consider the issue of writ dismissal

By: Nilima Pathak
Supreme Court ready to consider the issue of writ dismissal

Supreme Court ready to consider the issue of writ dismissal It agreed on the ground that the delay was due to the assessee filing another plea on a similar dispute The Supreme Court has agreed to consider the issue of dismissal of the writ on the ground of delay that came in the way of the assessee filing another plea involving a similar contention. Earlier, it was submitted in...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


Supreme Court ready to consider the issue of writ dismissal

It agreed on the ground that the delay was due to the assessee filing another plea on a similar dispute

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider the issue of dismissal of the writ on the ground of delay that came in the way of the assessee filing another plea involving a similar contention.

Earlier, it was submitted in the Kerala High Court that the assessee Apollo Tyres, Kochi, had set up two in-house Research and Development (R&D) facilities at Perambra (Cochin) and Limda (Vadodara). The Ministry of Science and Technology and the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) recognized the facilities. While the facility at Perambra was granted recognition by DSIR in 1987, Limda's approval came in 2001.

The issue raised was of whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in confirming the disallowance of deduction under the Income Tax Act.

The Kerala High Court had held that the judgment passed against the assessee, barred it from re-agitating the same issue in the assessment proceedings. The request of the assessee was to give approval with effect from 2004. But the judgment approved was granted with effect from 2007 to 2010. The Delhi High Court confirmed the same.

The plea of the assessee was in respect to the same Assessment Year for which a different conclusion was expected from the apex court. All the authorities under the Act had rejected the argument for weighted depreciation.

The division bench of Justice A M Khanwilkar and Justice Ravi Kumar issued a notice in the Special Leave Petition (SLP). Assailing the Kerala High Court's decision, the bench ordered, "The fact that the decision in the earlier petition had attained inability, it will not come in the way of the petitioner. That is because that petition was dismissed merely on the ground of delay."

Nilima Pathak

Nilima Pathak

TAGS:
  • Supreme Court 
  • Kerala High Court 
  • Justice AM Khanwilkar 
  • Justice Ravi Kumar 
  • Appellate Tribunal 
  • Income Tax Act 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
Adrianus-Schoorl

Wizz Financial hires White & Case partner

Ajay-Shaw-&-Rimali-Batra

DSK Legal advised Ministry of Railways in Make in India'

Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advised BRLMs on the IPO of LIC

Tax on Alimony

Tax on Alimony

Recommended Articles
  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X