• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    +
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
    • Global Articles
    • Global Deals
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
    • ESG
    • Gaming
    • Inclusion & Diversity
  • Law Firms
    • Global Law Firm
    • Asia Law Firm
    • India Law Firm
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas
    Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advised the
  • Leniency-Plus
    India plans to introduce "Leniency Plus"
  • Herbert-Smith-Freehills
    Herbert Smith Freehills advised Globe
  • Income-Tax-Appeal
    Income Tax Appeal not maintainable
  • Tax
    ITAT rules that unexplained cash will
  • ITAT
    ITAT rules on deduction under IT Act
  • Ropes-&-Gray
    Ropes & Gray represents Heartland Dental
  • Karnataka-High-Court
    Banks can't initiate criminal
  • NCLAT
    Adjudicating Authority obligated to
  • Cyril-Amarchand-Mangaldas
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised Aditya
HomeNewsFrom the Courts
22 Feb 2021 8:30 AM GMT

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal of Murder Accused; Suspicion even if Very Strong Cannot Be Considered as Proof

By Legal Era
Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal of Murder Accused; Suspicion even if Very Strong Cannot Be Considered as Proof

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal of Murder Accused; Suspicion even if Very Strong Cannot Be Considered as Proof The Supreme Court of India (SC) in its order dated 12 February 2021, in the case titled State of Odisha (Petitioners) v. Banabihari Mohapatra (Respondents) held that suspicion, however strong, cannot take the place of proof, and it stressed on the fact that an accused is presumed to...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal of Murder Accused; Suspicion even if Very Strong Cannot Be Considered as Proof

The Supreme Court of India (SC) in its order dated 12 February 2021, in the case titled State of Odisha (Petitioners) v. Banabihari Mohapatra (Respondents) held that suspicion, however strong, cannot take the place of proof, and it stressed on the fact that an accused is presumed to be innocent unless proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The SC bench comprising of Justices Indira Banerjee and Hemant Gupta, observed while upholding an order of the High Court of Orissa (HC) wherein the HC acquitted two accused persons of murdering a home guard by electrocuting him.

The Bench said that there has to be a chain of evidence so complete as to show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused. It added that "It is well settled by a plethora of judicial pronouncement of this court that suspicion, however strong cannot take the place of proof. An accused is presumed to be innocent unless proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt."

The factual matrix of the case is that an FIR was lodged with the Police by Gitanjali Tadu (wife of the deceased person) her husband Bijay Kumar Tadu had been working deputed at Chandabali police station.

It was alleged by the woman that the accused Banabihari Mohapatra, his son Luja and other accomplices killed her husband with an electric shock after administering some poisonous substances to him.

The Top Court stated that as per the post mortem report the cause of death was electric shock and there is no conclusive evidence that the death was homicidal.

The SC bench added that "The mere fact that the deceased was lying dead at a room held by the accused respondent No 1 and that the accused respondents had informed the complainant that the deceased had been lying motionless and still and not responding to shouts and calls, does not establish that the accused respondents murdered the deceased."

The Court stressed the point that the prosecution has miserably failed to establish the guilt of the accused in this case and the Trial Court has rightly acquitted the accused respondents. The HC has also upheld the findings of the Trial Court.

The Apex Court referred to the judgment in the case of Shanti Devi v. State of Rajasthan (2012) 12 SCC 158, and it reiterated the following principles for conviction of the accused based on circumstantial evidence-

a. "The circumstances from which an inference of guilt is sought to be proved must be cogently or firmly established.

b. The circumstances should be of a definite tendency unerringly pointing towards the guilt of the accused.

c. The circumstances taken cumulatively must form a chain so complete that there is no escape from the conclusion that within all human probability, the crime was committed by the accused and none else.

d. The circumstantial evidence in order to sustain conviction must be complete and incapable of explanation of any other hypothesis than that of the guilt of the accused and such evidence should not only be consistent with the guilt of the accused but should be inconsistent with his innocence."

The SC stated, "Before a case against an accused can be said to be fully established on circumstantial evidence, the circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is to be drawn must fully be established and the facts so established should be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused."

It further said, "There is a strong possibility that the accused, which was as per the opinion of the doctor, who performed the autopsy, intoxicated with alcohol, might have accidentally touched a live electrical wire while he was asleep."

While dismissing the appeal, the bench added "It cannot be said that the reasons given by the HC to reverse the conviction of the accused are flimsy, untenable or bordering on the perverse appreciation of evidence."


Click to download here Full Judgment


TAGS:
  • Supreme Court 
  • Acquittal 
  • Murder 
  • Proof 
  • Suspicion 
  • Justice Indira Banerjee 
  • Justice Hemant Gupta 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
TAGS:
  • Supreme Court 
  • Acquittal 
  • Murder 
  • Proof 
  • Suspicion 
  • Justice Indira Banerjee 
  • Justice Hemant Gupta 
Trending Now
Okram-Prithvi-Singha

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas welcomes Okram Prithvi Singha as

Shardul-Amarchand-Mangaldas

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advised the Book Running Lead

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

Can A Retailer Charge More Than MRP?

Herbert-Smith-Freehills

Herbert Smith Freehills advised Globe Telecom on sale of

Recommended Articles
Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal Undertaking

Can an Arbitral Award Be Stayed Upon Surety and Personal

Stamping Out Illegal Streaming Technology – Recent Amendments to The Copyright Act

Stamping Out Illegal Streaming Technology – Recent

The Quincecare Duty of Care Story Continues

The Quincecare Duty of Care Story Continues

Recent Developments and Trends in Diversity & Inclusion in Japan

Recent Developments and Trends in Diversity & Inclusion in

  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X