- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
Bob Woodward Wins Dismissal of Trump’s $50 Million Audiobook Lawsuit
Bob Woodward Wins Dismissal of Trump’s $50 Million Audiobook Lawsuit
Introduction
A federal judge in Manhattan has dismissed former U.S. President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against journalist Bob Woodward, his publisher Simon & Schuster, and Paramount Global. The lawsuit claimed copyright infringement over the publication of tapes from interviews for Woodward’s 2020 best-seller Rage as an audiobook.
Factual Background
Woodward interviewed Trump 19 times between December 2019 and August 2020, and about 20% of Rage came from these interviews. The audiobook The Trump Tapes was released in October 2022, featuring Woodward’s commentary.
Procedural Background
Trump sued in January 2023, claiming he told Woodward repeatedly that the interviews were meant solely for the book. Woodward argued that federal law barred Trump from copyrighting interviews conducted as part of his official duties.
Reasoning & Analysis
The judge, Paul Gardephe, stated that Trump did not plausibly allege that he and Woodward intended to be joint authors of The Trump Tapes. The judge further held that federal copyright law preempted Trump’s state law-based claims.
Findings
The judge dismissed the lawsuit, giving Trump until August 18, 2025 to amend his complaint a third time. Trump’s legal team has indicated they plan to continue fighting the decision.
Implications
The decision is a victory for Woodward, Simon & Schuster, and Paramount Global. The case highlights the complexities of copyright law and the challenges of asserting ownership over interviews.
Final Outcome
The lawsuit was dismissed, with the judge allowing Trump to amend his complaint.



