- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
DLA Piper Advised Softcare on International Sanctions for HKD 2.38 Billion Hong Kong
DLA Piper Advised Softcare on International Sanctions for HKD 2.38 Billion Hong Kong
DLA Piper acted as the International Sanctions Legal Advisor for Softcare, a multinational hygiene product manufacturer, on its successful listing on the Main Board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The IPO raised approximately HKD2.38 billion (USD306 million). Softcare’s Hong Kong public offering was oversubscribed 1,813.77 times, while the international placement was oversubscribed 34.33 times.
Softcare’s history can be traced back to 2009, when it was established as an internal business segment of Sunda Group. The company launched Softcare baby diapers in Ghana in 2009, and has since grown to become the leading diaper and sanitary napkin brand by sales volume in Africa.
Softcare intends to use the majority of the IPO proceeds (approximately 71.4%) to expand overall production capacity and upgrade production lines, approximately 11.6% will be allocated for marketing and promotion in Africa, Latin America, and Central Asia; 4.7% for strategic acquisitions in the hygiene product industry; 0.4% to upgrade and implement a CRM system across its global operations; 2.6% for engaging management consultants to analyse new markets and products; and the remaining 9.3% for working capital and general corporate purposes.
DLA Piper provided legal guidance and compliance support related to international sanctions and export controls laws – a critical component for Softcare, which operates across multiple jurisdictions, including regions with complex trade and regulatory environments.
Nate commented: “Softcare’s cross-border growth strategy required careful assessment of international sanctions regimes. Supporting its IPO journey further demonstrates our extensive experience in this field to provide advice that reflects the realities of operating in diverse global markets.”
DLA Piper’s international trade team includes native Mandarin-speaking U.S. qualified trade lawyers in Shanghai and Singapore, a former U.S. Court of International Trade clerk and semiconductor industry in-house counsel in Singapore, alongside the expertise of our Hong Kong capital markets team. The firm’s trade lawyers in the UK, EU, Canada, Australia, and other jurisdictions advise on the applicability of sanctions enacted by these jurisdictions. DLA Piper has recently acted as International Sanctions Legal Advisors for several Hong Kong IPO listings, including Folangsi, Ruichang International, and Legal Advisor on Tariffs for Lens Technology.
The DLA Piper team was led by Nathan (Nate) Bush, (Partner in International Trade, Antitrust and Investigations/ Litigation & Regulatory Practice), with support from Yong Min Oh (Senior Associate/ Litigation & Regulatory Practice/ Singapore) and Jan Zhan (Associate/ Litigation & Regulatory Practice/ Singapore). Additional support was provided by Runyu Liu (Senior Associate) from Shanghai Kaiman Law Firm in China.
Click to know more about DLA Piper
If you have a news or deal publication or would like to collaborate on content, columns, or article publications, connect with the Legal Era News Network Team and email us at info@legalera.in or call us on +91 8879634922.


