- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program launched by USPTO
The pilot program is available for certain pending utility patent applications however applicants must meet strict eligibility requirements.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has launched the Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program, an initiative designed to accelerate patent examination by assessing how a limited number of claims affects pendency and examination quality.
The USPTO reportedly stated that it “anticipates that focusing examination resources on already-filed, unexamined applications that have a streamlined claim set will enhance efforts to reduce the USPTO’s inventory and pendency.” Applications accepted into the pilot program will be reportedly “advanced out of turn (i.e., accorded special status) for examination until a first office action is issued.” The application will no longer be treated as special during examination after the first office action.
The pilot program is available for certain pending utility patent applications however applicants must meet strict eligibility requirements. An applicant must file a timely petition to make special in an original non-reissue, noncontinuing, utility application filed under 35 U.S.C. § 111(a), provided the application has an actual filing date that was before the publication date of the Notice in the Federal Register. National stage applications filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371 are not eligible to participate in the pilot program. Significantly, applications must not contain more than one independent claim, more than 10 total claims, or multiple dependent claims.
All claims other than the single independent claim must comply with a specific dependency format. A claim must be in proper dependent form under 35 U.S.C. § 112(d); the USPTO specified. It must refer to a previous claim, include every limitation of the previous claim referred to, and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter of the prior claim.
Reportedly, to comply with the dependency format for this pilot program, “the reference to the previous claim must appear in the preamble, and the claim must be directed to the same statutory class of invention as the independent claim.”
By filing a preliminary amendment before or with the petition to make special under the pilot program, an applicant may comply.
To make special, the petition must be filed with the petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(h) before the issuance of a first office action, including a written restriction requirement. A petition will be generally dismissed by the USPTO if the application has already been docketed to a particular examiner in a Technology Center at the time the petition is taken up for decision.
Reportedly, in addition, an applicant may file a petition to participate in the pilot program if “no inventor or joint inventor has been named as the inventor or a joint inventor on more than three other nonprovisional patent applications in which a petition to make special under this pilot program has been filed.”
Other requirements include: the petition to be submitted using Form PTO/SB/472, titled “CERTIFICATION AND PETITION TO MAKE SPECIAL UNDER THE STREAMLINED CLAIM SET PILOT PROGRAM”; petition to be filed electronically using the USPTO’s Patent Center; etc.
Petitions will be accepted by the pilot program until either 12 months from Monday, October 27, or until each Technology Center has docketed at least approximately 200 applications accepted into the pilot program, whichever occurs first.
Reportedly according to the program notice, significant disparities in participation across Technology Centers, “such as when the pilot program applications accepted in a Technology Center significantly exceeds 200,” may trigger early termination. If the pilot program is terminated, the USPTO will provide public notice.
The USPTO will publish on its website the total number of petitions filed and applications accepted into the pilot program for each Technology Centre to ensure transparency.



