- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
Sunkist Wins US Court Appeal to Block ‘Kist’ Trademark
IDI, based in Detroit, bought the rights to ‘Kist’, a vintage Midwestern soda brand, in 2009 and has marketed it in glass-bottle sodas and sparkling waters since 2014.
A US appeals court sided with Sunkist Growers, blocking a soft drink maker’s attempt to register a trademark for ‘Kist’ beverages. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit observed that the case “concerns kisses, sunlight, and soft drinks,” agreeing with Sunkist that the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) should have refused Intrastate Distributors Inc. (IDI) its ‘Kist’ trademark, as it could cause confusion with Sunkist’s famous orange sodas.
Sunkist Growers, a cooperative of citrus growers, has sold Sunkist soft drinks since the 1930s. Meanwhile, IDI, based in Detroit, acquired rights to the vintage Kist brand in 2009 and has sold it in glass-bottle sodas and sparkling waters since 2014.
Earlier, the USPTO rejected Sunkist’s opposition, finding that the brands would not confuse consumers because Sunkist references the sun while Kist alludes to kissing. The Federal Circuit has now reversed that ruling and blocked IDI’s trademark application.
Spokespersons and attorneys for both Sunkist and IDI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.



