Delhi High Court Restrains Use of & Ratan Tata Icon Award's Over Trademark Violation
Delhi High Court Restrains Use of 'Ratan Tata Icon Award' Over Trademark Violation
The Delhi High Court has issued an injunction against Rajat Srivastava and his company, Yuci Mentors Private Limited, preventing them from hosting an event under the name "Ratan Tata Icon Award". This decision follows a suit filed by Sir Ratan Tata Trust and Tata Trusts, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. The Court also barred the defendants from using logos, images, or any material associated with Ratan Tata and Tata Trusts.
During the hearing, Justice Mini Pushkarna observed: "This Court notes that Tata is a well-known mark. Late Mr. Ratan Tata is a well-known figure. His name itself is liable to be protected."
The Court is now considering whether 'Ratan Tata' should be legally recognized as a well-known trademark due to his widespread recognition and legacy.
The defendants agreed to discontinue the use of Ratan Tata's name and cancel the awards during the proceedings. As a result, the suit has been decreed, but the Court has sought a formal undertaking from the defendants. The case is scheduled for a compliance hearing on February 12.
The lawsuit revolves around the unauthorized use of well-known trademarks and personal identity associated with the Tata Group, including TATA, TATA TRUSTS, and the name and image of Ratan Tata. The plaintiffs accused Srivastava and his company of organizing fraudulent events and awards, such as the "Ratan Tata National Icon Award", falsely claiming association with Tata Trusts and Ratan Tata.
Despite receiving a takedown notice in December 2024, the defendants allegedly continued to advertise the events on social media and their website, worsening the infringement. The plaintiffs are seeking a permanent injunction to prevent further misuse of their trademarks, logos, and Ratan Tata’s name and image. They have also demanded ₹2 crore in damages, citing harm to their reputation and goodwill. The next hearing on February 12 will address compliance with the Court’s directives.
