The NCLT Mumbai bench ruled that an interim moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) prohibits the sale of a personal guarantor's property under the SARFAESI Act, even if a sale auction notice was issued before the moratorium's commencement.

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. (SAM & Co.) advised the Underwriters, viz., ICICI Securities Limited, Morgan Stanley

The emergence of branded residences in the real estate sector has been met with a great deal of enthusiasm from real estate

Permissibility Of Selective Capital Reduction Under The Companies Act, 2013 And The Wider “Take Private” Question In a departure from existing precedents, the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata...

The appellate authority dismissed the applicability of the Supreme Court’s Vidarbha principle

Helmy, Hamza & Partners, and Baker McKenzie advised Banque Misr on a significant EGP 2.8 billion financing for Landmark Developments’ 'STEI8HT' residential project in New Cairo City.

Distressed M&A Under The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Navigating Challenges And Opportunities The introduction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) has marked a...

Overturns the decision of the Bombay High Court

Analysis Of Repeal And Savings In Light Of The New Criminal Laws And Judicial Pronouncements Introduction The legal landscape is constantly evolving, particularly in the realm of criminal law....

The NCLAT Mumbai bench ruled that petitions under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) must be rejected if a genuine pre-existing dispute regarding operational debt is established, emphasizing the protection of personal guarantors' properties under the SARFAESI Act.

The judges refused to revisit eligibility standards that critics claimed caused uncertainty in intellectual property laws

Over 40 buyers claimed a default of Rs.112.90 crore against the realtor