- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- AI
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- ESG
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- AI
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- ESG
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Anand & Anand Represented Ahuja's Swift Strike Against Counterfeits

Anand & Anand Represented Ahuja's Swift Strike Against Counterfeits
Introduction
The Delhi High Court granted an ex parte ad interim injunction in favor of Ahuja Radios, a renowned manufacturer and seller of audio equipment, against Golden Electronics for trademark infringement.
Factual Background
Ahuja Radios, established in 1940, has a registered trademark 'AHUJA' since 1948, along with other registrations. The company alleged that Golden Electronics was trading under the deceptively similar name 'AHUJA' and/or 'AHUJA DEVICE'.
Procedural Background
The case was heard by HMJ Saurabh Banerjee, who granted the injunction on the first day of the hearing. The court appointed a Local Commissioner to visit Golden Electronics' premises to seize infringing products and documents.
Issues Involved in the Case
1. Whether the defendant's use of the 'AHUJA' trademark constituted trademark infringement.
2. Whether the defendant's actions amounted to passing off.
3. Whether Ahuja Radios was entitled to an injunction.
Submissions of the Parties
Plaintiff (Ahuja Radios): The defendant's use of the 'AHUJA' trademark was an attempt to exploit Ahuja Radios' goodwill and brand reputation. The plaintiff sought an injunction and damages.
Defendant (Golden Electronics): The defendant did not contest the allegations.
Discussion on Judgments and Legal Citations
The court relied on relevant case law, including previous judgments on trademark infringement and passing off.
Reasoning and Analysis by the Judge
The court held that Golden Electronics' actions constituted trademark infringement and passing off.
Basis for Calculating Damages
No damages were awarded in this case.
Final Decision
The court granted an ex parte ad interim injunction against Golden Electronics, restraining them from dealing in goods under the 'AHUJA' trademark or any deceptively similar mark.
Law Settled in This Case
The case establishes that trademark infringement can have serious consequences, including significant damages and reputational harm.
In this case, Ahuja Radios was represented by Team Anand & Anand led by Pravin Anand, Shobhit Agarwal, and Mr. Prajjwal, Advocates.