- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Bhushan Power And Steel’s Lenders Seek NCLAT Order To JSW Steel To Execute Resolution Plan Without Any Delay
[ By Bobby Anthony ]Bhushan Power and Steel’s (BPSL) Committee of Creditors (CoC) have urged the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to direct JSW Steel, which is the bankrupt firm’s highest bidder to implement the corporate insolvency resolution plan (CIRP) without further delay.Incidentally, JSW Steel had offered to pay Rs 19,350 crore to its financial creditors and Rs 350...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Bhushan Power and Steel’s (BPSL) Committee of Creditors (CoC) have urged the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to direct JSW Steel, which is the bankrupt firm’s highest bidder to implement the corporate insolvency resolution plan (CIRP) without further delay.
Incidentally, JSW Steel had offered to pay Rs 19,350 crore to its financial creditors and Rs 350 crore to its operational creditors in its bid which was approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on September 5.
JSW Steel is being investigated for alleged siphoning of thousands of crores of funds borrowed from banks on behalf of BPSL.
It may be recalled that banks and financial institutions also want JSW Steel to pay a minimum 8.25% interest on their Rs 19,350 crore dues from October 4 until the plan is implemented. They had also claimed their share of the profits earned by BPSL during the CIRP period.
However, lenders have urged the NCLAT to heed JSW Steel’s prayer for protection against attachment or confiscation of assets of BPSL under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
On September 13, JSW Steel had filed an application with the NCLAT seeking protection of the insolvent firm’s assets, after takeover.
JSW Steel wanted that the assets should not be attached by the investigating agencies. It also did not want profits earned by BPSL during the corporate insolvency resolution process to be distributed to lenders.
On September 16, the NCLAT had issued notices to lenders and declined to pass any order on JSW Steel’s application to stay the implementation of BPSL’s resolution plan for BPSL.