- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Bombay HC Halts DRI Investigation; Grants Relief To Adani Group In Rs 29,000-Crore Coal Imports Overvaluation Case
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The Bombay High Court has passed an order halting a Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) probe into alleged overvaluation of Rs 29,000-crore Indonesian coal imports by the Adani Group.The order has quashed quashed all Letters Rogatory (LR) sent by DRI to 14 countries, including Singapore and UAE, seeking information about the alleged overvaluation on coal...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Bombay High Court has passed an order halting a Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) probe into alleged overvaluation of Rs 29,000-crore Indonesian coal imports by the Adani Group.
The order has quashed quashed all Letters Rogatory (LR) sent by DRI to 14 countries, including Singapore and UAE, seeking information about the alleged overvaluation on coal imports.
However, the Bombay High Court made it clear that it has not gone into the merits of the LRs.
ourt made it clear that it has merely dealt with the contention as to whether it was permissible for a magistrate to issue Letters Rogatory (LRs) without following the procedure mandated under the Criminal Procedure Code.
The court ruled that the DRI had begun probing a non-cognizable offense without obtaining the necessary permission from the magistrate.
Under such circumstances, the Letters Rogatory issued do not meet the test, the court ruled.
Incidentally, the case deals with a fundamental question regarding the commission of offense punishable under the Customs Act, 1962.
It also deals with whether or not the DRI is entitled to take recourse to provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to get a Letter Rogatory issued.
The Bombay High Court held that that the Criminal Procedure Code provision is not independent to the extent that any investigating authority can use, without filing a First Information Report.
Due to this reason, it issued an order quashing the letter rogatory issued by the DRI.