- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
Bombay High Court Allows Edelweiss Asset Management Company’s Petition Seeking Disclosure Of All DHFL Assets
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The Bombay High Court has allowed Edelweiss Asset Management Company’s petition seeking disclosure of all assets and liabilities of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL), which has been given four weeks to file its reply.The court has also extended the injunction on DHFL from making repayments to either secured or unsecured lenders, until further order.The...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to 
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

The Bombay High Court has allowed Edelweiss Asset Management Company’s petition seeking disclosure of all assets and liabilities of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL), which has been given four weeks to file its reply.
The court has also extended the injunction on DHFL from making repayments to either secured or unsecured lenders, until further order.
The decision came after the court heard petitions filed by both Nippon India Mutual Fund and Edelweiss in the matter pertaining to DHFL dues.
In a recent clarification to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), Edelweiss Financial Services had stated that its subsidiary Edelweiss Asset Management had approached the Bombay High Court to recover principal amount and interest dues from DHFL.
Earlier, Edelweiss Asset Management Company had approached the Bombay High Court to recover its dues of around Rs 70 crore from DHFL.
Edelweiss had sought the appointment of a court receiver and disclosure of all DHFL assets. It has also sought an injunction against paying any unsecured lender.
Edelweiss’s counsel stated that it has sought an injunction against from paying any unsecured lender. This is because DHFL used hypothecated receivables, which were in favor of Edelweiss and liquidated them in order to pay unsecured creditors.


