- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Bombay High Court designates 22 advocates to the position of Senior Advocate
The Bombay High Court has designated 22 advocates to the position of Senior Advocate of the High Court. The Court issued a notification on 11th February, 2020 to this effect. The Court exercised its power conferred by Section 16 (2) of the Advocates Act, 1961 and in accordance with the Rules framed by the High Court.1 Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare2 Jayant Pandurang Mulgaonkar3 Mukesh...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Bombay High Court has designated 22 advocates to the position of Senior Advocate of the High Court. The Court issued a notification on 11th February, 2020 to this effect. The Court exercised its power conferred by Section 16 (2) of the Advocates Act, 1961 and in accordance with the Rules framed by the High Court.
1 Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare
2 Jayant Pandurang Mulgaonkar
3 Mukesh Vitthalrao Samarth
4 Ramchandra Gajanan Ramani
5 Agnelo Francis Diniz
6 Rajendra Vyankatesh Pai
7 Ravindra Laxmanrao Khapre
8 Tushad Khurshed Cooper
9 Santosh Rama Rivankar
10 Sanjog Sadanand Parab
11 Rajendra Adhik Shirodkar
12 Manoj Shamrao Mohite
13 Pradeep Shivnarain Jetly
14 Rajendrakumar Sudhakar Deshmukh
15 Vijaykumar Damodhar Sapkal
16 Vishwajit Parshuram Sawant
17 Aabad Harshad Ponda
18 Snehal Krishnakant Shah
19 Nikhil M. Sakhardande
20 Dr. Birendra Kumar Saraf
21 Zal Tehmtan Andhyarujina
22 Sharan Haresh Jagtiani