- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
CBI Raids Maruti Suzuki’s Former MD Jagdish Khattar For Cheating Punjab National Bank To The Tune Of Rs 110 Crore
By Bobby Anthony The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has raided Maruti Suzuki India Limited’s (MSIL) former managing director Jagdish Khattar for alleged criminal conspiracy, criminal misconduct and cheating Punjab National Bank (PNB) to the tune of Rs 110 crore.The CBI has carried out searches at the residential premises of 77-year-old Khattar and his company Carnation Auto, according...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has raided Maruti Suzuki India Limited’s (MSIL) former managing director Jagdish Khattar for alleged criminal conspiracy, criminal misconduct and cheating Punjab National Bank (PNB) to the tune of Rs 110 crore.
The CBI has carried out searches at the residential premises of 77-year-old Khattar and his company Carnation Auto, according to CBI officials.
In a case registered by the probe agency on December 20, based on a complaint by the PNB, the CBI has alleged that Khattar, along with “unknown public servants", cheated the bank of the amount, after he had failed to repay the amount.
It may be recalled that Khattar had launched Carnation Realty Pvt Ltd and Carnation Broking for which he was granted a loan of Rs 170 crore, which was sanctioned in 2009. The loan was declared a non- performing asset (NPA) in 2015 with effect from 2012, according to the First Information Report (FIR) filed by the CBI.
According to the FIR filed by the CBI, the accused borrowers dishonestly and fraudulently sold off the goods hypothecated to the bank without its permission and diverted the funds thereby causing wrongful loss was caused to the PNB.
The CBI has also alleged that PNB’s forensic audit found that Khattar had fraudulently sold fixed assets amounting to Rs 66.92 crore for a mere Rs4.55 crore without the bank’s prior approval, especially since these assets had been furnished to the bank as collateral.
The CBI stated that an investigation had been launched to look into the matter though a look-out circular against Khattar has not yet been issued.