- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
CCI Cracks Down On Cement Cartel: Ultratech, India Cements Face Probe
CCI Cracks Down On Cement Cartel: Ultratech, India Cements Face Probe
Introduction
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has directed Ultratech and its subsidiary India Cements to submit detailed financial and income tax records for five years after finding evidence of anti-competitive collusion with two other cement manufacturers.
Factual Background
The CCI probe was initiated based on a complaint by ONGC alleging cartelisation in its tenders. The investigation found evidence of Ultratech and its subsidiary engaging in collusion with Shree Digvijay Cement and Dalmia Cements, with a middleman allegedly facilitating coordination among the parties.
Procedural Background
The CCI has directed Ultratech and its executives to submit detailed financial and income tax records for five years and to provide a formal response to the investigation report. Senior executives of the company have been held accountable under the relevant sections of the Competition Act.
Issues Involved
1. Cartelisation: The CCI is investigating allegations of cartelisation in the cement industry.
2. Anti-Competitive Practices: The investigation found evidence of anti-competitive practices, including collusion among the parties.
3. Compliance with Competition Act: The CCI is ensuring compliance with the Competition Act and protecting consumer interests.
Contentions of the Parties
ONGC's Contentions: ONGC alleged cartelisation in its tenders, which led to the CCI investigation.
Ultratech's Contentions: Ultratech and its subsidiary have been directed to submit detailed financial and income tax records and to provide a formal response to the investigation report.
Reasoning & Analysis
The CCI's investigation depicts the importance of ensuring compliance with competition laws and protecting consumer interests. The cement industry has been under scrutiny for alleged cartelisation, and the CCI's action demonstrates its commitment to promoting competition and fair market practices.
The direction to submit detailed financial and income tax records for five years suggests that the CCI is seeking to understand the financial implications of the alleged cartelisation and to determine the extent of the anti-competitive practices.
Final Outcome
The CCI's investigation is ongoing, and the final outcome will depend on the evidence submitted by Ultratech and its subsidiary and the findings of the investigation.
Implications
The CCI's action has significant implications for the cement industry and other sectors where cartelisation and anti-competitive practices are prevalent. It highlights the importance of compliance with competition laws and the potential consequences of non-compliance.



