- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
CGST & Central Excise Dept’s Levy Rs.273 Crore Tax Demand On ICICI Lombard

CGST & Central Excise Dept’s Levy Rs.273 Crore Tax Demand On ICICI Lombard
Strap – Covering various states, it was for motor claims settlement
The Additional Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Palghar has slapped a Rs.273.44 crore penalty on ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017.
The order confirmed the tax demand of Rs.273,44,50,284 under Section 50 and a penalty of the same amount under Section 74 and Section 122 (from July 2017 to March 2022), covering various states.
It relates to an industry-wide issue on the applicability of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on salvage and ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) on motor claims settlement.
The company deposited 104.13 crore under protest without accepting any liability. It held:
1. The value deduction of scrap/salvage/wreck, etc from the motor vehicle claim payable by the company amounted to supply under Section 7.
2. In case of claims settled under the reimbursement mode, the company erroneously availed and utilized the ITC on tax invoices issued in the name of the repairer/motor garages.