- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
DETTOL wins Trademark Infringement case in Delhi HC against DEVTOL
Reckitt Benckiser Pvt. Ltd. – manufacturer of the famous brand “DETTOL” sought permanent injunction in the Delhi High Court against a company which used the trademark “DEVTOL” alleging it infringed the trademark of the famous brand.The High Court directed the company – Mohit Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. to stop using the name “DEVTOL” and also imposed a fine of Rs. 1 lakh on...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Reckitt Benckiser Pvt. Ltd. – manufacturer of the famous brand “DETTOL” sought permanent injunction in the Delhi High Court against a company which used the trademark “DEVTOL” alleging it infringed the trademark of the famous brand.
The High Court directed the company – Mohit Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. to stop using the name “DEVTOL” and also imposed a fine of Rs. 1 lakh on the company and directed that the amount be deposited in the Juvenile Justice Fund within one week.
Justice Rajiv Shakdher said of the Delhi High Court said, “To be noted, the plaintiff is a manufacturer of a well-known antiseptic which is sold under the registered trademark and logo ‘Dettol’. The plaintiff has approached this Court seeking various reliefs against the infringing mark and logo i.e. ‘Devtol.’” The order was passed after the counsel for Mohit Petrochemicals made a statement that they will not manufacture and/ or sell the product, the hand sanitizer under the infringing mark “DEVTOL”. The defendant’s counsel also stated that the company has initiated the withdrawal of the infringing mark and has already written to its agents and dealers to withdraw the product bearing the infringing mark from the market.