- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
[ By Bobby Anthony ]Doha Bank has moved the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seeking to protect its rights over proceeds generated from any prospective resolution plan for Reliance Infratel Ltd.The bank stated that it may receive a lesser percentage of the recoverable amount as its voting rights in the debt-ridden company’s committee of creditors were reduced.It may be recalled...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to 
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Doha Bank has moved the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seeking to protect its rights over proceeds generated from any prospective resolution plan for Reliance Infratel Ltd.
The bank stated that it may receive a lesser percentage of the recoverable amount as its voting rights in the debt-ridden company’s committee of creditors were reduced.
It may be recalled that Reliance Infratel had issued certain guarantees in favor of another Anil Ambani Group company Reliance Communications Ltd.
However, the telecom company started defaulting on its payment obligations, after which the lenders invoked guarantees issued by Reliance Infratel and converted them into debt.
That gave the lenders to RCom voting rights in Reliance Infratel’s CoC and bringing down the Doha Bank-led consortium’s voting rights from 55% to 15%.
Reliance Infratel was dragged into insolvency by the Indian arm of the Swedish telecom equipment maker Ericsson after it defaulted on its payment obligations.
The Mumbai bench of the NCLT had admitted the insolvency petition in May 2018. It had stayed the resolution process in June 2018 and again vacated it in April 2019.


