- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Gujarat HC to commence physical hearings from 16 September after 12 employees test positive for Covid-19
The Gujarat High Court has notified that physical courts will commence only from September 16, 2020 as 12 employees of the Court were found to be infected with COVID-19.Earlier the Court was to start physical functioning from September 14, 2020, but now has been altered after the development.A circular has been issued by the High Court stating that the employees were found COVID-19 positive...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Gujarat High Court has notified that physical courts will commence only from September 16, 2020 as 12 employees of the Court were found to be infected with COVID-19.
Earlier the Court was to start physical functioning from September 14, 2020, but now has been altered after the development.
A circular has been issued by the High Court stating that the employees were found COVID-19 positive after the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) carried out antigen tests at the High Court premises.
The Circular read, “Therefore the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation would carry out a thorough and comprehensive exercise for cleaning and sanitising the entire premises of the High Court, Judicial Academy, Auditorium, Kayda Bhavan, bank, post office, etc. including the inside of the buildings such as court rooms, chambers, offices, record rooms, wash rooms, etc. from 12th September 2020. For carrying out the above exercise, 3 to 4 days are required and in view of the above, after due deliberations the Standing Committee has resolved that the entire premises of the High Court be shut.”
The Court would be shut down from 12th to 15th September 2020. During this period the judicial functioning (both virtual and physical) of the High Court will remain suspended. It will resume only on September 16.