- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
₹40,000 Payment Revives Limitation Period, NCLAT Upholds Insolvency Petition
₹40,000 Payment Revives Limitation Period, NCLAT Upholds Insolvency Petition
Introduction
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that a payment of ₹40,000 effectively revived the limitation period and validated the claim raised by the operational creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
Factual Background
The operational creditors had filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC against the corporate debtor. The corporate debtor challenged the application, arguing that the claim was time-barred.
Procedural Background
The NCLT admitted the insolvency petition, and the corporate debtor appealed against the order before the NCLAT.
Issues
1. Limitation: Whether the payment of ₹40,000 revived the limitation period and validated the claim raised by the operational creditors.
Contentions of the Parties
Operational Creditors: The payment of ₹40,000 was an acknowledgment of debt and revived the limitation period.
Corporate Debtor: The claim was time-barred, and the payment did not validate the claim.
Reasoning and Analysis
The NCLAT endorsed the reasoning of the Ahmedabad NCLT, holding that the payment of ₹40,000 effectively revived the limitation period and validated the claim raised by the operational creditors. The Tribunal found that the operational creditor’s application was within limitation and that the NCLT rightly admitted the insolvency petition.
Decision
The NCLAT bench comprising Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain, Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan and Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) dismissed the appeal, upholding the NCLT's order admitting the insolvency petition.
Implications
The judgment clarifies the effect of part payments on the limitation period under the IBC.



