- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Infosys Co-Founders Have No Role At All In Whistleblower Complaint, Chairman Nandan Nilekani Tells Stock Exchange
[ By Bobby Anthony ]Infosys Chairman of the Board (non-executive) Nandan Nilekani stated in a filing to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) that recent speculations suggesting the involvement of the company’s co-founders in the whistleblower complaints are not true.He stated that such speculations are appalling and seem to be aimed at tarnishing the image of some of “the most accomplished...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Infosys Chairman of the Board (non-executive) Nandan Nilekani stated in a filing to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) that recent speculations suggesting the involvement of the company’s co-founders in the whistleblower complaints are not true.
He stated that such speculations are appalling and seem to be aimed at tarnishing the image of some of “the most accomplished and respected individuals.”
“Infosys strongly condemns the mischievous insinuations made by anonymous sources against the co-founders and former colleagues, suggesting their involvement in the recent whistleblower allegations,” his statement to the BSE read.
Nilekani stated in his filing to the BSE that he has deep regard for the life-long contribution of all Infosys co-founders.
“They have built this institution and have served this company selflessly and even today remain committed to the long-term success of Infosys,” Nilekani’s statement to the BSE read.
His statement to the BSE also mentioned that an audit committee has appointed an external law firm to conduct an independent investigation into the allegations.
“We will share the outcome of the investigation at the relevant time with all stakeholders,” read Nilekani’s statement.