• Advertise
  • Membership
  • Sign inSUBSCRIBE
Legal Era
X
Sign in
  • Home
  • News
    +
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    +
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events
  • News
    • From the Courts
    • Policy & Law
    • Supreme Court (India)
    • High Court (India)
    • TAX Updates
    • MARKET WATCH
    • Deal Street
    • Global Insights
    • IBC Cases
    • Hires & Moves
    • IP News
    • Competition Verdict
  • Articles
    • ABOUT THE LAW
    • AWARDS & ACCOLADES
    • Aerospace
    • Agriculture
    • Alternate Dispute Resolution
    • Banking and Finance
    • Bankruptcy
    • Book Review
    • Bribery & Corruption
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Competition Law
    • Conference Reports
    • Consumer Products
    • Contract
    • Corporate Governance
    • Corporate Law
    • Covid-19
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Protection
    • Defence
    • Digital Economy
    • E-commerce
    • Employment Law
    • Energy and Natural Resources
    • Entertainment and Sports Law
    • Environmental Law
    • FDI
    • Food and Beverage
    • Health Care
    • IBC Diaries
    • Insurance Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • International Law
    • Labour Laws
    • Litigation
    • Litigation Funding
    • Manufacturing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • NFTs
    • Privacy
    • Private Equity
    • Project Finance
    • Real Estate
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Technology Media and Telecom
    • Tributes
    • Zoom In
    • Take On Board
    • In Focus
    • Law & Policy and Regulation
    • IP & Tech Era
    • Viewpoint
    • Arbitration & Mediation
    • Tax
    • Student Corner
  • Law Firms
  • In-House
  • Rankings
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Events

Top Stories

  • NCLT
    Debt owed by one Partner does not make
  • DSK Legal advised CARE in relation to the acquisition of CHL group
    DSK Legal advised CARE in relation to
  • Tax
    ITAT rules on TDS credit not being
  • Capital-Loss
    ITAT rules on expenditure claims in a
  • Income-Tax-Act
    Madras High Court rules on remand
  • CBIRC approves Goldman Sachs-ICBC launch of wealth management joint venture
    CBIRC approves Goldman Sachs-ICBC launch
  • McDermott
    McDermott appoints eight IP partners to
  • SEBI
    SEBI fines PGIM AMC, its CEO Ajit Menon,
  • Property-Right
    'Right to Property is a basic human
  • German-Government
    German Government proposes new
HomeNews
29 March 2022 4:45 AM GMT

ITAT rules ignorance of the law not a reason to reject a penalty

By Legal Era
ITAT rules ignorance of the law not a reason to reject a penalty

ITAT rules ignorance of the law not a reason to reject a penalty The assessee exceeded the basic threshold limit and failed to file an audit report The Hyderabad Branch of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that on the pretext of ignorance of the law, the penalty cannot be quashed for anyone under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, an individual, had approached...

ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to Legal Era

Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

Subscribe Now
AlreadyaSubscriber?SigninNow
View Plans


ITAT rules ignorance of the law not a reason to reject a penalty

The assessee exceeded the basic threshold limit and failed to file an audit report

The Hyderabad Branch of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that on the pretext of ignorance of the law, the penalty cannot be quashed for anyone under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The assessee, an individual, had approached the tribunal with a grievance that the lower authorities had erroneously imposed a penalty of Rs.1,50,000 under the law.

He contended that he was drawing a regular salary and it was only in the impugned assessment year that he carried out corresponding transactions that required an audit report under the IT Act. He pleaded that the penalty be waived, as he was ignorant of the law.

The Coram of Judicial Member SS Godara and Accountant Member A Mohan Alankamony observed, "It is an admitted fact that the assessee's case is very well covered under the IT Act. His turnover has indeed exceeded the basic threshold limit of Rs.40 lakhs in the relevant previous year. There is further no dispute that the assessee had neither prepared the audit report nor was it furnished in time to the assessing authority."

"We, therefore, hold that mere ignorance of law pleaded herein at the assessee's behest hardly deserves to be treated as a reasonable cause for disturbing the impugned penalty as upheld in the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) discussion," the bench added.

TAGS:
  • Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 
  • Income Tax Act 
  • Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 
Next Story
Similar Posts
See More
Trending Now
DSK Legal advised CARE in relation to the acquisition of CHL group

DSK Legal advised CARE in relation to the acquisition of CHL

Tax on Alimony

Tax on Alimony

Defamation

'Action of defamation on fair reporting is unhealthy for a

Gautam-Saha

Gautam Saha leaves AZB & Partners to join Talwar Thakore &

Recommended Articles
Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition Regulation

Digital Markets Must be Defined Well for Competition

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in India

Legal Considerations for Investments in Data Centers in

From General Counsel to Independent Director

From General Counsel to Independent Director

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

Revitalizing The Insolvency Regime in India

  • News
  • From the Courts
  • Supreme Court (India)
  • High Court (India)
  • Global Insights
  • Deal Street
  • Hires & Moves
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Articles
  • Zoom In
  • Take On Board
  • In Focus
  • Law & Policy
  • IP & Tech Era
  • Viewpoint
  • Arbitration & Mediation
  • Tax
  • Student Corner
  • Interviews
  • Law Firms
  • E-Magazine
  • Legal Era TV
  • Membership
  • Reader's Feedback
  • Cartoons
  • Subscribe
Follow Us
Subscribe Newsletter
  • 2022© All rights reserved Legal Era Media Group
  • Who We Are
  • Careers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Powered by  Hocalwire
X
X