High Court (India)

September 10, 2019

Madras High Court Lawyers Urge Chief Justice Of India Gogoi To Reconsider Chief Justice Tahilramani’s Transfer

[ By Bobby Anthony ]


Lawyers of the Madras High Court have written to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Ranjan Gogoi urging him to reconsider the transfer of Madras High Court Chief Justice Vijaya Tahilramani to the Meghalaya High Court stating that transfers have become a weapon in the hands of the powerful Supreme Court Collegium.

Madras High Court lawyers have also sent a representation to the Chief Justice of India and members of the Supreme Court Collegium stating that such kind of arbitrary transfer whittles away the independence of the judiciary as well as the confidence of judges.

The letter stated that transfers have become a weapon in the hands of the all-powerful collegium, which is not a creation of legislation but that of the judiciary itself and there are no checks and balances in matters of administration of the judiciary.

The lawyers also mentioned a line about Justice Khalid, a former judge of the Supreme Court, who once recalled as to how transfer can be a more dangerous weapon than a dismissal, reminding one of the dark days of the Emergency.

“The style of functioning of the Collegium leaves one with the impression that the high court is subordinate to the Collegium. This affects the majesty of the high court and erodes the primacy of position given to high courts in the constitutional scheme of things,” the lawyers said.

In the letter, the lawyers have mentioned the observation of a constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India in SP Gupta Vs Union of India, which had observed, "The power of transfer is a highly dangerous power involving great hardship and, injury to the Judge transferred including a stigma on his reputation in cases where the transfer is not effected pursuant to any policy but the Judge is picked out for transfer on a selective basis and to my mind, it makes no difference whether the transfer is made by the Government on its own initiative or it is made at the instance of the Chief Justice of India."

“These words ring true in the transfer of Chief Justice Vijaya Tahilramani of the Madras High Court who has unceremoniously been transferred from a chartered high court to the high court of Meghalaya which has only three judges in the all India seniority,” the letter stated.

Chief Justice Vijaya Tahilramani was the acting Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court on two occasions before she was elevated as the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court on August 4 2018.

She has just one more year of service before the superannuation in September 2020.

The Supreme Court collegium has recommended transfer of Madras High Court Chief Justice V.K. Tahilramani to the Meghalaya High Court and Meghalaya HC Chief Justice A K Mittal to the Madras High Court.

“These transfer have raised the eyebrows of many members of the bar who looks upon the judiciary as protecting the rule of law,” the lawyers wrote, adding that transfering her to one of the smallest high courts which is the Meghalaya High Court is nothing short of “punishment and humiliation”.

It is ironical that a person of her seniority is being assigned to the smallest high court and a judge who is junior to her in the Madras High Court is being elevated and transferred as Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court, the letter stated.

Meanwhile, Tahilramani has decided to go on leave to protest against the transfer. She has also tendered her resignation to President Ram Nath Kovind and sent a copy of it to Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi who heads the Supreme Court Collegium.

The lawyers of the Madras High Court Bar Council had also staged a protest recently against Chief Justice Tahilramani's transfer.

Related Post

latest News

  • SC directs all High Courts to send original records and their English translations

    The Supreme Court on December 12 issued a Circular stating that in all criminal appeals wherever translation is required to be done into English, the ...

    Read More
  • National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Has An Exclusive Jurisdiction To Try All Company Matters, Says NCLAT

    The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLT) has held that no other forum or court, except the NCLT itself, has any jurisdiction to try matters ...

    Read More
  • Personal Data Protection Bill listed for Parliament's winter session

    The Lower House of the Parliament – Lok Sabha has released the tentative list of bills that the Indian Government is expected to introduce and pass ...

    Read More