- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
SEBI Approves Key Amendments to Minimum Public Offer Rules: A Boost for Mega Listings
SEBI Approves Key Amendments to Minimum Public Offer Rules: A Boost for Mega Listings
“Anchor investor allocation increased to 40% in SEBI's latest IPO regulatory changes”
In a significant move aimed at enhancing the ease of doing business in India, the Securities and Exchange Board of India has approved amendments to the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957. These changes pertain to the Minimum Public Offer requirements and the timelines for compliance with Minimum Public Shareholding for issuers, especially targeting large-scale companies preparing for listing. This decision is poised to provide large firms with a more practical and flexible pathway to go public, with an emphasis on supporting mega listings in the Indian stock market.
Key Amendments to Minimum Public Offer Regulations
The primary objective of these amendments is to alleviate the pressure on large companies seeking to list on Indian exchanges while ensuring sufficient public participation in these listings. Under the revised rules, the criteria for the Minimum Public Offer for companies with varying market capitalizations have been clearly defined:
- For companies with a market capitalization above ₹50,000 crore, the Minimum Public Offer is now set at ₹1,000 crore plus 8% of the company's offering.
- For companies with a market capitalization between ₹1 lakh crore and ₹5 lakh crore, the required public offering is ₹6,250 crore plus 2.75%.
- For companies exceeding ₹5 lakh crore market capitalization, the Minimum Public Offer is set at ₹15,000 crore plus 1%, with a minimum floor requirement of 2.5%.
These revised guidelines are designed to provide a tailored approach for different tiers of companies, considering the size and scope of their potential listings. By introducing these thresholds, SEBI aims to facilitate smoother and more structured public offerings for large firms.
Relaxation of Timelines for Minimum Public Shareholding
In addition to the revised MPO guidelines, SEBI has also relaxed the timelines for achieving the mandated 25% public float. Previously, companies were under considerable pressure to achieve this public shareholding requirement within a short period after listing. However, with the new amendment, firms now have up to 10 years to comply with the 25% minimum public shareholding. This extended timeline is expected to ease the compliance burden on large corporations, particularly those engaged in mega IPOs, giving them ample time to gradually bring down the promoters' shareholding to the required level. This relaxation is likely to be a game-changer, particularly for companies planning to raise significant capital through public offerings, as it allows more flexibility in the pace at which they can increase public participation in their ownership structure.
Changes to Anchor Investor Allocation
SEBI has also introduced a key change regarding anchor investors in initial public offerings. The allocation of shares to anchor investors—the institutional investors who commit to a portion of the IPO before it opens to the general public—has been increased to 40% of the total IPO size. Previously, this allocation was capped at one-third (approximately 33%) of the IPO size. The increased anchor investor allocation is aimed at ensuring strong institutional participation, which often acts as a stabilizing factor during the initial trading phase of the stock. In particular, this increase will provide more opportunities for institutional investors to secure a meaningful portion of the offering, thus enhancing the overall stability of the listing.
Specific Provisions for Anchor Investors
- Insurance and Pension Funds: Of the 40% anchor investor allocation, 7% is specifically earmarked for insurance and pension funds, which are long-term investors with a stabilizing effect on the market.
- Mutual Funds: The remaining 33% of the anchor allocation is reserved for mutual funds, ensuring that a significant portion of the IPO is distributed among large, diversified institutional investors.
In addition, the number of anchor investor allottees will increase in line with the size of the IPO. For every ₹250 crore block of the offering, the number of anchor investors will rise from 5 to 15. This scaling approach ensures a broader and more inclusive participation in the listing process, further promoting market stability and investor confidence.
Broader Implications for the Market
The SEBI amendments come at a time when India is witnessing an increasing number of large corporations considering IPOs. The relaxed regulations and revised public float requirements are expected to encourage more companies, especially those with large market capitalizations, to explore the Indian stock market as a viable listing option. By making the process more practical and less burdensome for these companies, SEBI is fostering a more investor-friendly environment that aligns with international best practices. For institutional investors, the increased allocation to anchor investors and the new provisions for mutual funds, insurance, and pension funds ensure greater participation and a diversified investor base in IPOs. This will likely boost the overall quality of the offerings, as institutional investors are often seen as key players in ensuring the stability and liquidity of newly listed stocks.
A Step Towards Strengthening India’s Capital Market
These amendments represent a critical step towards modernizing India’s capital markets and aligning them with global standards. By easing the regulatory burdens on large corporations and encouraging greater institutional participation, SEBI is not only enhancing the attractiveness of the Indian market but also fostering a more sustainable and stable capital market ecosystem. The latest amendments to the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957, reflect SEBI's commitment to simplifying the listing process for large companies while maintaining market integrity and transparency. With more relaxed timelines, tailored public offering requirements, and increased institutional participation through anchor investors, the Indian capital markets are poised for a new era of growth. These changes not only provide large firms with a smoother path to listing but also create an environment that encourages investor confidence and broad-based participation in the IPO process.



