- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
SEBI relaxes IPO timelines and MPS rules
Offers relief to companies planning to tap the primary market
With markets experiencing sharp swings and investor confidence remaining subdued, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has rolled out a series of temporary relaxations related to initial public offering (IPO) timelines and minimum public shareholding (MPS) norms.
The market regulator has prolonged the validity of observation letters set to expire up to 30 September 2026. It offered relief to over two dozen companies planning to tap the primary market.
Currently, such observation letters are valid for 12 months, beyond which companies are required to submit fresh draft papers. For confidential filings, issuers get up to 18 months to launch their IPOs.
Taking into account the feedback from industry participants and ongoing market uncertainty, SEBI’s circular stated that it had opted for a one-time extension of observation letter validity until September 2026.
Firms opting for this extension will need to file updated offer documents and provide an undertaking from their lead managers confirming adherence to the Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements (ICDR) norms.
The regulator highlighted that companies had struggled to access capital markets due to the continuing conflict in West Asia, leading many to delay, revise or shelve their issuance plans. This had increased the chances of approvals lapsing and duplication of regulatory procedures.
In another circular, the regulator announced a one-time exemption from penal action for listed entities that have not met minimum public shareholding (MPS) requirements. This relaxation covers companies with compliance deadlines falling between 1 April and 30 September 2026.
Meanwhile, exchanges and depositories have been directed to refrain from initiating penalties during this window, and any action already taken since 2 April will be rolled back.
Mahavir Lunawat, chairman of the Association of Investment Bankers of India, remarked, “The one-time relaxation will support IPO-bound companies with approvals nearing expiry by providing additional flexibility. It allows issuers to better assess market conditions and strategically time their IPO launches amid heightened volatility.”
Non-compliance with MPS norms generally attracts penalties such as monetary fines, freezing of promoter shareholdings and other regulatory curbs.
These steps are in line with similar relief measures introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Recently, industry bodies raised concerns over the challenging fundraising environment and the difficulty of achieving the mandated 25 percent public shareholding within stipulated timelines.
According to Prime Database, Financial Year 2026 witnessed record fundraising of Rs.1.78 trillion through 112 mainboard IPOs. This exceeded the earlier peak of Rs.1.62 trillion mobilised via 78 offerings.
Currently, around 144 companies looking to raise Rs.1.75 trillion have already received SEBI clearance and are awaiting market entry. Another 63 firms aiming to mobilise Rs.1.37 trillion are in the approval stage.
However, the ongoing volatility and lacklustre post-listing performance have dampened momentum. During the 2026 Financial Year, 18 companies seeking to raise Rs.22,000 crore allowed their approvals to expire, while 15 others with plans to raise Rs.9,200 crore withdrew their draft proposals.
Participation from retail investors in IPOs also softened over the year, indicating cautious sentiment amid modest listing gains.



