- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Artificial Intelligence
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Governance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- Middle East
- Africa
MCA Likely To Ask Serious Fraud Investigation Office Or Registrar Of Companies To Investigate Infosys Allegations
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) is likely to depute the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) or the Registrar of Companies (RoC) to investigate whistleblower allegations of corporate wrong doing at Infosys.The MCA and the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) might even decide to work together, exchange data as well as information which they find during...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to 
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) is likely to depute the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) or the Registrar of Companies (RoC) to investigate whistleblower allegations of corporate wrong doing at Infosys.
The MCA and the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) might even decide to work together, exchange data as well as information which they find during the course of investigation, if a decision is taken to initiate a probe.
As a matter of fact, the SEBI has already started its investigation into allegations of unethical practices and it is also trying to find out if there was any insider trading.
Infosys might have to be investigated about its customer contracts, stock transactions, undisclosed upfront commitments as well as revenue recognition, since the nature of the recent allegations would not just bring the Infosys management under scrutiny, but also the company board itself.
However, at the moment, the MCA is keeping a close watch on Infosys developments to see if there are any violations of the Companies Act and waiting to see what the SEBI reveals.
No decision has been taken yet, though any probe would have to be multi-layered, involving a high degree of collaboration between the MCA and SEBI. It is expected that any Infosys probe might be a case where the MCA and SEBI might benefit from each other’s expertise.
Incidentally, it may be recalled that the MCA and SEBI had signed a memorandum of understanding for data exchange in June.
Among the high-profile cases which the SFIO which reports to the MCA is probing currently are alleged frauds at Religare Enterprises, IL&FS as well as Bhushan Steel.
The SFIO is also probing Deloitte based on a whistleblower complaint. Though Deloitte is the statutory auditor for Infosys, so far there has not been any hint or suggestion of any wrongdoing by the audit firm.


